tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17393554808702264672024-03-13T04:39:55.955+05:30Koan Advisory Updatesvivan sharanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14813392915753123620noreply@blogger.comBlogger138125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1739355480870226467.post-76074540037466574612019-12-08T13:19:00.001+05:302019-12-08T13:19:07.678+05:30On RCEP, Mohit Kalawatia and Raghav Priyadarshi, The Pioneer, 27 November<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:OfficeDocumentSettings>
<o:AllowPNG/>
</o:OfficeDocumentSettings>
</xml><![endif]-->
<!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<w:WordDocument>
<w:View>Normal</w:View>
<w:Zoom>0</w:Zoom>
<w:TrackMoves/>
<w:TrackFormatting/>
<w:PunctuationKerning/>
<w:ValidateAgainstSchemas/>
<w:SaveIfXMLInvalid>false</w:SaveIfXMLInvalid>
<w:IgnoreMixedContent>false</w:IgnoreMixedContent>
<w:AlwaysShowPlaceholderText>false</w:AlwaysShowPlaceholderText>
<w:DoNotPromoteQF/>
<w:LidThemeOther>EN-GB</w:LidThemeOther>
<w:LidThemeAsian>X-NONE</w:LidThemeAsian>
<w:LidThemeComplexScript>X-NONE</w:LidThemeComplexScript>
<w:Compatibility>
<w:BreakWrappedTables/>
<w:SnapToGridInCell/>
<w:WrapTextWithPunct/>
<w:UseAsianBreakRules/>
<w:DontGrowAutofit/>
<w:SplitPgBreakAndParaMark/>
<w:EnableOpenTypeKerning/>
<w:DontFlipMirrorIndents/>
<w:OverrideTableStyleHps/>
</w:Compatibility>
<m:mathPr>
<m:mathFont m:val="Cambria Math"/>
<m:brkBin m:val="before"/>
<m:brkBinSub m:val="--"/>
<m:smallFrac m:val="off"/>
<m:dispDef/>
<m:lMargin m:val="0"/>
<m:rMargin m:val="0"/>
<m:defJc m:val="centerGroup"/>
<m:wrapIndent m:val="1440"/>
<m:intLim m:val="subSup"/>
<m:naryLim m:val="undOvr"/>
</m:mathPr></w:WordDocument>
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<w:LatentStyles DefLockedState="false" DefUnhideWhenUsed="false"
DefSemiHidden="false" DefQFormat="false" DefPriority="99"
LatentStyleCount="375">
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="0" QFormat="true" Name="Normal"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="9" QFormat="true" Name="heading 1"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="2" SemiHidden="true"
UnhideWhenUsed="true" QFormat="true" Name="heading 2"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="2" SemiHidden="true"
UnhideWhenUsed="true" QFormat="true" Name="heading 3"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="2" SemiHidden="true"
UnhideWhenUsed="true" QFormat="true" Name="heading 4"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="2" SemiHidden="true"
UnhideWhenUsed="true" QFormat="true" Name="heading 5"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="2" SemiHidden="true"
UnhideWhenUsed="true" QFormat="true" Name="heading 6"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="9" SemiHidden="true"
UnhideWhenUsed="true" QFormat="true" Name="heading 7"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="9" SemiHidden="true"
UnhideWhenUsed="true" QFormat="true" Name="heading 8"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="9" SemiHidden="true"
UnhideWhenUsed="true" QFormat="true" Name="heading 9"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true"
Name="index 1"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true"
Name="index 2"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true"
Name="index 3"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true"
Name="index 4"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true"
Name="index 5"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true"
Name="index 6"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true"
Name="index 7"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true"
Name="index 8"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true"
Name="index 9"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="39" SemiHidden="true"
UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="toc 1"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="39" SemiHidden="true"
UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="toc 2"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="39" SemiHidden="true"
UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="toc 3"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="39" SemiHidden="true"
UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="toc 4"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="39" SemiHidden="true"
UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="toc 5"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="39" SemiHidden="true"
UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="toc 6"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="39" SemiHidden="true"
UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="toc 7"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="39" SemiHidden="true"
UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="toc 8"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="39" SemiHidden="true"
UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="toc 9"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true"
Name="Normal Indent"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true"
Name="footnote text"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true"
Name="annotation text"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true"
Name="header"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true"
Name="footer"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true"
Name="index heading"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="35" SemiHidden="true"
UnhideWhenUsed="true" QFormat="true" Name="caption"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true"
Name="table of figures"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true"
Name="envelope address"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true"
Name="envelope return"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true"
Name="footnote reference"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true"
Name="annotation reference"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true"
Name="line number"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true"
Name="page number"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true"
Name="endnote reference"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true"
Name="endnote text"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true"
Name="table of authorities"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true"
Name="macro"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true"
Name="toa heading"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true"
Name="List"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true"
Name="List Bullet"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true"
Name="List Number"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true"
Name="List 2"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true"
Name="List 3"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true"
Name="List 4"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true"
Name="List 5"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true"
Name="List Bullet 2"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true"
Name="List Bullet 3"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true"
Name="List Bullet 4"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true"
Name="List Bullet 5"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true"
Name="List Number 2"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="49" SemiHidden="true"
UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="List Number 3"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true"
Name="List Number 4"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true"
Name="List Number 5"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="5" QFormat="true" Name="Title"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true"
Name="Closing"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true"
Name="Signature"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="1" SemiHidden="true"
UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="Default Paragraph Font"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="1" SemiHidden="true"
UnhideWhenUsed="true" QFormat="true" Name="Body Text"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true"
Name="Body Text Indent"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true"
Name="List Continue"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true"
Name="List Continue 2"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true"
Name="List Continue 3"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true"
Name="List Continue 4"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true"
Name="List Continue 5"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true"
Name="Message Header"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="11" QFormat="true" Name="Subtitle"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true"
Name="Salutation"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true"
Name="Date"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true"
Name="Body Text First Indent"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true"
Name="Body Text First Indent 2"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true"
Name="Note Heading"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="1" SemiHidden="true"
UnhideWhenUsed="true" QFormat="true" Name="Body Text 2"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="1" SemiHidden="true"
UnhideWhenUsed="true" QFormat="true" Name="Body Text 3"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true"
Name="Body Text Indent 2"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true"
Name="Body Text Indent 3"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true"
Name="Block Text"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true"
Name="Hyperlink"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true"
Name="FollowedHyperlink"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="22" QFormat="true" Name="Strong"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="20" QFormat="true" Name="Emphasis"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true"
Name="Document Map"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true"
Name="Plain Text"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true"
Name="E-mail Signature"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true"
Name="HTML Top of Form"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true"
Name="HTML Bottom of Form"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true"
Name="Normal (Web)"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true"
Name="HTML Acronym"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true"
Name="HTML Address"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true"
Name="HTML Cite"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true"
Name="HTML Code"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true"
Name="HTML Definition"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true"
Name="HTML Keyboard"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true"
Name="HTML Preformatted"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true"
Name="HTML Sample"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true"
Name="HTML Typewriter"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true"
Name="HTML Variable"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true"
Name="Normal Table"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true"
Name="annotation subject"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true"
Name="No List"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true"
Name="Outline List 1"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true"
Name="Outline List 2"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true"
Name="Outline List 3"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true"
Name="Table Simple 1"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true"
Name="Table Simple 2"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true"
Name="Table Simple 3"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true"
Name="Table Classic 1"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true"
Name="Table Classic 2"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true"
Name="Table Classic 3"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true"
Name="Table Classic 4"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true"
Name="Table Colorful 1"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true"
Name="Table Colorful 2"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true"
Name="Table Colorful 3"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true"
Name="Table Columns 1"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true"
Name="Table Columns 2"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true"
Name="Table Columns 3"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true"
Name="Table Columns 4"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true"
Name="Table Columns 5"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true"
Name="Table Grid 1"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true"
Name="Table Grid 2"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true"
Name="Table Grid 3"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true"
Name="Table Grid 4"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true"
Name="Table Grid 5"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true"
Name="Table Grid 6"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true"
Name="Table Grid 7"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true"
Name="Table Grid 8"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true"
Name="Table List 1"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true"
Name="Table List 2"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true"
Name="Table List 3"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true"
Name="Table List 4"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true"
Name="Table List 5"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true"
Name="Table List 6"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true"
Name="Table List 7"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true"
Name="Table List 8"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true"
Name="Table 3D effects 1"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true"
Name="Table 3D effects 2"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true"
Name="Table 3D effects 3"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true"
Name="Table Contemporary"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true"
Name="Table Elegant"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true"
Name="Table Professional"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true"
Name="Table Subtle 1"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true"
Name="Table Subtle 2"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true"
Name="Table Web 1"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true"
Name="Table Web 2"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true"
Name="Table Web 3"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true"
Name="Balloon Text"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="39" Name="Table Grid"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true"
Name="Table Theme"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" Name="Placeholder Text"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="1" QFormat="true" Name="No Spacing"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="60" Name="Light Shading"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="61" Name="Light List"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="62" Name="Light Grid"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="63" Name="Medium Shading 1"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="64" Name="Medium Shading 2"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="65" Name="Medium List 1"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="66" Name="Medium List 2"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="67" Name="Medium Grid 1"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="68" Name="Medium Grid 2"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="69" Name="Medium Grid 3"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="70" Name="Dark List"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="71" Name="Colorful Shading"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="72" Name="Colorful List"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="73" Name="Colorful Grid"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="60" Name="Light Shading Accent 1"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="61" Name="Light List Accent 1"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="62" Name="Light Grid Accent 1"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="63" Name="Medium Shading 1 Accent 1"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="64" Name="Medium Shading 2 Accent 1"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="65" Name="Medium List 1 Accent 1"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" Name="Revision"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="34" QFormat="true"
Name="List Paragraph"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="29" QFormat="true" Name="Quote"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="30" QFormat="true"
Name="Intense Quote"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="66" Name="Medium List 2 Accent 1"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="67" Name="Medium Grid 1 Accent 1"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="68" Name="Medium Grid 2 Accent 1"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="69" Name="Medium Grid 3 Accent 1"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="70" Name="Dark List Accent 1"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="71" Name="Colorful Shading Accent 1"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="72" Name="Colorful List Accent 1"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="73" Name="Colorful Grid Accent 1"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="60" Name="Light Shading Accent 2"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="61" Name="Light List Accent 2"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="62" Name="Light Grid Accent 2"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="63" Name="Medium Shading 1 Accent 2"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="64" Name="Medium Shading 2 Accent 2"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="65" Name="Medium List 1 Accent 2"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="66" Name="Medium List 2 Accent 2"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="67" Name="Medium Grid 1 Accent 2"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="68" Name="Medium Grid 2 Accent 2"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="69" Name="Medium Grid 3 Accent 2"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="70" Name="Dark List Accent 2"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="71" Name="Colorful Shading Accent 2"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="72" Name="Colorful List Accent 2"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="73" Name="Colorful Grid Accent 2"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="60" Name="Light Shading Accent 3"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="61" Name="Light List Accent 3"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="62" Name="Light Grid Accent 3"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="63" Name="Medium Shading 1 Accent 3"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="64" Name="Medium Shading 2 Accent 3"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="65" Name="Medium List 1 Accent 3"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="66" Name="Medium List 2 Accent 3"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="67" Name="Medium Grid 1 Accent 3"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="68" Name="Medium Grid 2 Accent 3"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="69" Name="Medium Grid 3 Accent 3"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="70" Name="Dark List Accent 3"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="71" Name="Colorful Shading Accent 3"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="72" Name="Colorful List Accent 3"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="73" Name="Colorful Grid Accent 3"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="60" Name="Light Shading Accent 4"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="61" Name="Light List Accent 4"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="62" Name="Light Grid Accent 4"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="63" Name="Medium Shading 1 Accent 4"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="64" Name="Medium Shading 2 Accent 4"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="65" Name="Medium List 1 Accent 4"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="66" Name="Medium List 2 Accent 4"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="67" Name="Medium Grid 1 Accent 4"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="68" Name="Medium Grid 2 Accent 4"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="69" Name="Medium Grid 3 Accent 4"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="70" Name="Dark List Accent 4"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="71" Name="Colorful Shading Accent 4"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="72" Name="Colorful List Accent 4"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="73" Name="Colorful Grid Accent 4"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="60" Name="Light Shading Accent 5"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="61" Name="Light List Accent 5"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="62" Name="Light Grid Accent 5"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="63" Name="Medium Shading 1 Accent 5"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="64" Name="Medium Shading 2 Accent 5"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="65" Name="Medium List 1 Accent 5"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="66" Name="Medium List 2 Accent 5"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="67" Name="Medium Grid 1 Accent 5"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="68" Name="Medium Grid 2 Accent 5"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="69" Name="Medium Grid 3 Accent 5"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="70" Name="Dark List Accent 5"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="71" Name="Colorful Shading Accent 5"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="72" Name="Colorful List Accent 5"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="73" Name="Colorful Grid Accent 5"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="60" Name="Light Shading Accent 6"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="61" Name="Light List Accent 6"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="62" Name="Light Grid Accent 6"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="63" Name="Medium Shading 1 Accent 6"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="64" Name="Medium Shading 2 Accent 6"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="65" Name="Medium List 1 Accent 6"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="66" Name="Medium List 2 Accent 6"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="67" Name="Medium Grid 1 Accent 6"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="68" Name="Medium Grid 2 Accent 6"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="69" Name="Medium Grid 3 Accent 6"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="70" Name="Dark List Accent 6"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="71" Name="Colorful Shading Accent 6"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="72" Name="Colorful List Accent 6"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="73" Name="Colorful Grid Accent 6"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="19" QFormat="true"
Name="Subtle Emphasis"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="21" QFormat="true"
Name="Intense Emphasis"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="31" QFormat="true"
Name="Subtle Reference"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="32" QFormat="true"
Name="Intense Reference"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="33" QFormat="true" Name="Book Title"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="37" SemiHidden="true"
UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="Bibliography"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="39" SemiHidden="true"
UnhideWhenUsed="true" QFormat="true" Name="TOC Heading"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="41" Name="Plain Table 1"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="42" Name="Plain Table 2"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="43" Name="Plain Table 3"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="44" Name="Plain Table 4"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="45" Name="Plain Table 5"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="40" Name="Grid Table Light"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="46" Name="Grid Table 1 Light"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="47" Name="Grid Table 2"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="48" Name="Grid Table 3"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="49" Name="Grid Table 4"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="50" Name="Grid Table 5 Dark"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="51" Name="Grid Table 6 Colorful"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="52" Name="Grid Table 7 Colorful"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="46"
Name="Grid Table 1 Light Accent 1"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="47" Name="Grid Table 2 Accent 1"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="48" Name="Grid Table 3 Accent 1"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="49" Name="Grid Table 4 Accent 1"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="50" Name="Grid Table 5 Dark Accent 1"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="51"
Name="Grid Table 6 Colorful Accent 1"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="52"
Name="Grid Table 7 Colorful Accent 1"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="46"
Name="Grid Table 1 Light Accent 2"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="47" Name="Grid Table 2 Accent 2"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="48" Name="Grid Table 3 Accent 2"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="49" Name="Grid Table 4 Accent 2"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="50" Name="Grid Table 5 Dark Accent 2"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="51"
Name="Grid Table 6 Colorful Accent 2"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="52"
Name="Grid Table 7 Colorful Accent 2"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="46"
Name="Grid Table 1 Light Accent 3"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="47" Name="Grid Table 2 Accent 3"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="48" Name="Grid Table 3 Accent 3"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="49" Name="Grid Table 4 Accent 3"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="50" Name="Grid Table 5 Dark Accent 3"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="51"
Name="Grid Table 6 Colorful Accent 3"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="52"
Name="Grid Table 7 Colorful Accent 3"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="46"
Name="Grid Table 1 Light Accent 4"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="47" Name="Grid Table 2 Accent 4"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="48" Name="Grid Table 3 Accent 4"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="49" Name="Grid Table 4 Accent 4"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="50" Name="Grid Table 5 Dark Accent 4"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="51"
Name="Grid Table 6 Colorful Accent 4"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="52"
Name="Grid Table 7 Colorful Accent 4"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="46"
Name="Grid Table 1 Light Accent 5"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="47" Name="Grid Table 2 Accent 5"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="48" Name="Grid Table 3 Accent 5"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="49" Name="Grid Table 4 Accent 5"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="50" Name="Grid Table 5 Dark Accent 5"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="51"
Name="Grid Table 6 Colorful Accent 5"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="52"
Name="Grid Table 7 Colorful Accent 5"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="46"
Name="Grid Table 1 Light Accent 6"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="47" Name="Grid Table 2 Accent 6"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="48" Name="Grid Table 3 Accent 6"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="49" Name="Grid Table 4 Accent 6"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="50" Name="Grid Table 5 Dark Accent 6"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="51"
Name="Grid Table 6 Colorful Accent 6"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="52"
Name="Grid Table 7 Colorful Accent 6"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="46" Name="List Table 1 Light"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="47" Name="List Table 2"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="48" Name="List Table 3"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="49" Name="List Table 4"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="50" Name="List Table 5 Dark"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="51" Name="List Table 6 Colorful"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="52" Name="List Table 7 Colorful"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="46"
Name="List Table 1 Light Accent 1"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="47" Name="List Table 2 Accent 1"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="48" Name="List Table 3 Accent 1"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="49" Name="List Table 4 Accent 1"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="50" Name="List Table 5 Dark Accent 1"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="51"
Name="List Table 6 Colorful Accent 1"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="52"
Name="List Table 7 Colorful Accent 1"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="46"
Name="List Table 1 Light Accent 2"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="47" Name="List Table 2 Accent 2"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="48" Name="List Table 3 Accent 2"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="49" Name="List Table 4 Accent 2"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="50" Name="List Table 5 Dark Accent 2"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="51"
Name="List Table 6 Colorful Accent 2"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="52"
Name="List Table 7 Colorful Accent 2"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="46"
Name="List Table 1 Light Accent 3"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="47" Name="List Table 2 Accent 3"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="48" Name="List Table 3 Accent 3"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="49" Name="List Table 4 Accent 3"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="50" Name="List Table 5 Dark Accent 3"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="51"
Name="List Table 6 Colorful Accent 3"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="52"
Name="List Table 7 Colorful Accent 3"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="46"
Name="List Table 1 Light Accent 4"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="47" Name="List Table 2 Accent 4"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="48" Name="List Table 3 Accent 4"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="49" Name="List Table 4 Accent 4"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="50" Name="List Table 5 Dark Accent 4"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="51"
Name="List Table 6 Colorful Accent 4"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="52"
Name="List Table 7 Colorful Accent 4"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="46"
Name="List Table 1 Light Accent 5"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="47" Name="List Table 2 Accent 5"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="48" Name="List Table 3 Accent 5"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="49" Name="List Table 4 Accent 5"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="50" Name="List Table 5 Dark Accent 5"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="51"
Name="List Table 6 Colorful Accent 5"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="52"
Name="List Table 7 Colorful Accent 5"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="46"
Name="List Table 1 Light Accent 6"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="47" Name="List Table 2 Accent 6"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="48" Name="List Table 3 Accent 6"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="49" Name="List Table 4 Accent 6"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="50" Name="List Table 5 Dark Accent 6"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="51"
Name="List Table 6 Colorful Accent 6"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="52"
Name="List Table 7 Colorful Accent 6"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true"
Name="Mention"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true"
Name="Smart Hyperlink"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true"
Name="Hashtag"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true"
Name="Unresolved Mention"/>
</w:LatentStyles>
</xml><![endif]-->
<style>
<!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:"Cambria Math";
panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;
mso-font-charset:0;
mso-generic-font-family:roman;
mso-font-pitch:variable;
mso-font-signature:-536870145 1107305727 0 0 415 0;}
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;
mso-font-charset:0;
mso-generic-font-family:swiss;
mso-font-pitch:variable;
mso-font-signature:-1610611985 1073750139 0 0 159 0;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{mso-style-unhide:no;
mso-style-qformat:yes;
mso-style-parent:"";
margin:0cm;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
mso-pagination:widow-orphan;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;
mso-ascii-font-family:Calibri;
mso-ascii-theme-font:minor-latin;
mso-fareast-font-family:Calibri;
mso-fareast-theme-font:minor-latin;
mso-hansi-font-family:Calibri;
mso-hansi-theme-font:minor-latin;
mso-bidi-font-family:"Times New Roman";
mso-bidi-theme-font:minor-bidi;
mso-ansi-language:EN-GB;}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{mso-style-noshow:yes;
mso-style-priority:99;
color:blue;
text-decoration:underline;
text-underline:single;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
{mso-style-noshow:yes;
mso-style-priority:99;
color:#954F72;
mso-themecolor:followedhyperlink;
text-decoration:underline;
text-underline:single;}
p
{mso-style-noshow:yes;
mso-style-priority:99;
mso-margin-top-alt:auto;
margin-right:0cm;
mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto;
margin-left:0cm;
mso-pagination:widow-orphan;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman",serif;
mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman";}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;
mso-default-props:yes;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;
mso-ascii-font-family:Calibri;
mso-ascii-theme-font:minor-latin;
mso-fareast-font-family:Calibri;
mso-fareast-theme-font:minor-latin;
mso-hansi-font-family:Calibri;
mso-hansi-theme-font:minor-latin;
mso-bidi-font-family:"Times New Roman";
mso-bidi-theme-font:minor-bidi;
mso-ansi-language:EN-GB;}
@page WordSection1
{size:595.0pt 842.0pt;
margin:72.0pt 72.0pt 72.0pt 72.0pt;
mso-header-margin:35.4pt;
mso-footer-margin:35.4pt;
mso-paper-source:0;}
div.WordSection1
{page:WordSection1;}
-->
</style>
<!--[if gte mso 10]>
<style>
/* Style Definitions */
table.MsoNormalTable
{mso-style-name:"Table Normal";
mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0;
mso-tstyle-colband-size:0;
mso-style-noshow:yes;
mso-style-priority:99;
mso-style-parent:"";
mso-padding-alt:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;
mso-para-margin:0cm;
mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt;
mso-pagination:widow-orphan;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;
mso-ascii-font-family:Calibri;
mso-ascii-theme-font:minor-latin;
mso-hansi-font-family:Calibri;
mso-hansi-theme-font:minor-latin;
mso-ansi-language:EN-GB;}
</style>
<![endif]-->
<!--StartFragment-->
<br />
<div style="background: white; margin-bottom: 15.0pt;">
<a href="https://www.dailypioneer.com/2019/columnists/not-a-recipe-for-disaster.html">https://www.dailypioneer.com/2019/columnists/not-a-recipe-for-disaster.html</a></div>
<div style="background: white; margin-bottom: 15.0pt;">
<span style="color: #666666; font-family: Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 12pt;">At the recently-concluded Regional Comprehensive Economic
Partnership (RECP) Summit, Prime Minister Narendra Modi announced that despite
seven years of negotiations, his Government had decided not to join this
plurilateral regional trade bloc that was launched by the Association of
South-East Asian Nations (</span><a href="https://www.dailypioneer.com/2019/india/pm-modi-leaves-for-home-after-attending-asean-india-summit.html" style="box-sizing: border-box; font-family: Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 12pt; outline: none !important;"><span style="color: #3584e6;">ASEAN</span></a><span style="color: #666666; font-family: Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 12pt;">) leaders and six other countries during the 21st
ASEAN Summit in Phnom Penh in November 2012.</span></div>
<div style="-webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; background: white; box-sizing: border-box; font-variant-caps: normal; font-variant-ligatures: normal; margin-bottom: 15.0pt; orphans: 2; text-decoration-color: initial; text-decoration-style: initial; widows: 2; word-spacing: 0px;">
<span style="color: #666666; font-family: "Arial",sans-serif;">
<iframe allowfullscreen="true" allowtransparency="true" frameborder="0" height="187" hspace="0" id="aswift_5" marginheight="0" marginwidth="0" name="aswift_5" scrolling="no" style="border-bottom-width: 0px; border-left-width: 0px; border-right-width: 0px; border-top-width: 0px; box-sizing: border-box; height: 187px; left: 0px; position: absolute; top: 0px; width: 745px;" vspace="0" width="745">
</iframe>
The objective of launching RCEP negotiations was to achieve a modern,
comprehensive, high-quality and mutually beneficial economic partnership
agreement among the ASEAN member States and its Free Trade Agreement (FTA)
partners.<o:p></o:p></span></div>
<div style="-webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; background: white; box-sizing: border-box; font-variant-caps: normal; font-variant-ligatures: normal; margin-bottom: 15.0pt; orphans: 2; text-decoration-color: initial; text-decoration-style: initial; widows: 2; word-spacing: 0px;">
<span style="color: #666666; font-family: "Arial",sans-serif;">Announcing
the country’s decision to stay out, Modi said, “India stands for greater
regional integration, as well as for freer trade and adherence to a rule-based
international order. India has been pro-actively, constructively and
meaningfully engaged in the RCEP negotiations since inception. India has worked
for the cherished objective of striking a balance, in the spirit of give and
take. Today, when we look around we see during seven years of RCEP
negotiations, many things, including the global economic and trade scenarios,
have changed. We cannot overlook these changes.”<o:p></o:p></span></div>
<div style="-webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; background: white; box-sizing: border-box; font-variant-caps: normal; font-variant-ligatures: normal; margin-bottom: 15.0pt; orphans: 2; text-decoration-color: initial; text-decoration-style: initial; widows: 2; word-spacing: 0px;">
<span style="color: #666666; font-family: "Arial",sans-serif;">Modi’s
decision came in the backdrop of intense domestic pressure from various
stakeholders, including political parties, State Governments and various
industry lobbies. Indian decision-makers were persuaded to shun the free trade
partnership due to shrill concerns that India would become a dumping ground for
Chinese products, adversely impacting Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises
(MSMEs) and also cripple its dairy industry due to the presence of majors such
as Australia and New Zealand in this trade grouping.<o:p></o:p></span></div>
<div style="-webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; background: white; box-sizing: border-box; font-variant-caps: normal; font-variant-ligatures: normal; margin-bottom: 15.0pt; orphans: 2; text-decoration-color: initial; text-decoration-style: initial; widows: 2; word-spacing: 0px;">
<span style="color: #666666; font-family: "Arial",sans-serif;">
<iframe allowfullscreen="true" allowtransparency="true" frameborder="0" height="187" hspace="0" id="aswift_6" marginheight="0" marginwidth="0" name="aswift_6" scrolling="no" style="border-bottom-width: 0px; border-left-width: 0px; border-right-width: 0px; border-top-width: 0px; box-sizing: border-box; height: 187px; left: 0px; position: absolute; top: 0px; width: 745px;" vspace="0" width="745">
</iframe>
Interestingly, India’s decision to withdraw from the RCEP came despite the
Ministry of Commerce’s High-Level Advisory Group (HLAG) recommending that the
country adopt an optimistic outlook towards RCEP. The HLAG, constituted under
the chairmanship of Surjit Bhalla — Executive Director for India at the
International Monetary Fund (IMF) and former member of the Prime Minister’s
Economic Advisory Council — comprised other high-ranking members such as
Foreign Minister Subrahmanyam Jaishankar and former Commerce Secretary Rajeev
Kher. The HLAG was tasked with recommending steps to boost the country’s share
in global merchandise and services trade, and formally came out with its
recommendations only days before the Prime Minister announced India’s
withdrawal from RCEP. Since then, the Commerce Minister has clarified that
India may still join the partnership if its concerns are addressed, though such
an eventuality seems unlikely in the near future.<o:p></o:p></span></div>
<div style="-webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; background: white; box-sizing: border-box; font-variant-caps: normal; font-variant-ligatures: normal; margin-bottom: 15.0pt; orphans: 2; text-decoration-color: initial; text-decoration-style: initial; widows: 2; word-spacing: 0px;">
<span style="color: #666666; font-family: "Arial",sans-serif;">To
an extent, India’s decision to withdraw was also influenced by the perceived
negative outcomes of earlier trade pacts it had entered into with Japan, Korea
and the ASEAN. A central theme which emerges across trade discussions, of which
India is a part, is the country’s perennial inward focus. This stance is
counter-intuitive since India has benefitted greatly from globalisation and
liberalised market access, evidenced not only in its services exports but also
through import of primary and intermediate goods for domestic value-addition
and re-export.<o:p></o:p></span></div>
<div style="-webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; background: white; box-sizing: border-box; font-variant-caps: normal; font-variant-ligatures: normal; margin-bottom: 15.0pt; orphans: 2; text-decoration-color: initial; text-decoration-style: initial; widows: 2; word-spacing: 0px;">
<span style="color: #666666; font-family: "Arial",sans-serif;">
<iframe allowfullscreen="true" allowtransparency="true" frameborder="0" height="187" hspace="0" id="aswift_7" marginheight="0" marginwidth="0" name="aswift_7" scrolling="no" style="border-bottom-width: 0px; border-left-width: 0px; border-right-width: 0px; border-top-width: 0px; box-sizing: border-box; height: 187px; left: 0px; position: absolute; top: 0px; width: 745px;" vspace="0" width="745">
</iframe>
Further, the impending stalemate at the World Trade Organisation (WTO),
precipitated by the US’s efforts to render the WTO appellate body comatose,
necessitates an exploration of other routes for trade enhancement. Bilateral
and plurilateral trade arrangements such as the RCEP have thus emerged as a
preferred alternative. Since the beginning of the Doha Round of trade
negotiations at the WTO in 2001, the number of such arrangements in force
globally has grown more than three-fold. During the same period, India inked
trade agreements with the ASEAN, Japan, South Korea and Singapore. However,
since 2011, India has not signed any further bilateral or plurilateral trade
agreements, primarily due to a growing perception that opening up of trade
borders has not served the country well.<o:p></o:p></span></div>
<div style="-webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; background: white; box-sizing: border-box; font-variant-caps: normal; font-variant-ligatures: normal; margin-bottom: 15.0pt; orphans: 2; text-decoration-color: initial; text-decoration-style: initial; widows: 2; word-spacing: 0px;">
<span style="color: #666666; font-family: "Arial",sans-serif;">Contrary
to this perception, such agreements have contributed immensely towards trade
creation. For instance, India currently has a trade surplus of $2.5 billion
with Singapore. Similarly, India’s trade deficit with ASEAN vis-à-vis its total
trade deficit witnessed a continuous decrease from 9.9 per cent in 2007 to 6.6
per cent in 2017; despite the fact that ASEAN’s share in India’s total trade
has remained more or less constant. Meanwhile, India’s deficit with China, a
non-FTA partner country, increased from 18 per cent of the total trade deficit
in 2007, to 40 per cent in 2017. Even within the aegis of the WTO, the concept
of flexible multilateralism has found several supporters. Flexible
multilateralism allows WTO members to advance and conclude plurilateral
agreements where full consensus is not yet possible. Examples of such
plurilateral arrangements include the Information Technology Agreements (ITA-I
and II) — while India is a signatory to ITA-I, it has refrained from adopting
the second iteration. More recently, taking forward the approach of flexible
multilateralism, 76 countries decided to initiate discussions on trade related
aspects of electronic commerce. India has so far not joined the discussion,
citing the erosion of policy space and the digital gap between member countries
among other reasons, for not doing so.<o:p></o:p></span></div>
<div style="-webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; background: white; box-sizing: border-box; font-variant-caps: normal; font-variant-ligatures: normal; margin-bottom: 15.0pt; orphans: 2; text-decoration-color: initial; text-decoration-style: initial; widows: 2; word-spacing: 0px;">
<span style="color: #666666; font-family: "Arial",sans-serif;">Looking
ahead, if India wants to achieve its target of becoming a $5 trillion economy
by 2024, then considerable efforts and resources are required to push its
exports. More importantly, the country will have to review its frozen approach
towards bilateral and plurilateral arrangements. Indeed, along with other
like-minded countries, the country should continue to ensure that the relevance
of a multilateral trading system is maintained. However, it is also important
that in light of changing global trade dynamics characterised by forward and backward
linkages, it cannot afford to ignore preferential agreements, or even limited
trade deals like the one it is currently exploring with the US.<o:p></o:p></span></div>
<div style="-webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; background: white; box-sizing: border-box; font-variant-caps: normal; font-variant-ligatures: normal; margin-bottom: 15.0pt; orphans: 2; text-decoration-color: initial; text-decoration-style: initial; widows: 2; word-spacing: 0px;">
<span style="color: #666666; font-family: "Arial",sans-serif;">Given
India’s political-economy compulsions, it is understandable that the country
remains wary of entering into far-reaching trade agreements proposed by
advanced jurisdictions. But India must nevertheless adopt an alternative
strategy to advance its self-interest. It is better to sit in the negotiating
room and disagree than to leave the room altogether.<o:p></o:p></span></div>
<div style="-webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; background: white; box-sizing: border-box; font-variant-caps: normal; font-variant-ligatures: normal; margin-bottom: 15.0pt; orphans: 2; text-decoration-color: initial; text-decoration-style: initial; widows: 2; word-spacing: 0px;">
<span style="color: #666666; font-family: "Arial",sans-serif;">Going
forward, the Indian leadership must resist the temptation of abstaining from
decisions due to perceived costs in the short-run. To begin with, there is an
urgent need to fix internal decision-making mechanisms. A more concerted and
coordinated effort across Government departments in evaluating trade
partnerships should be the way forward, instead of convening inter-ministerial
discussions as a reactionary measure. Government departments should engage with
the industry on a more frequent basis on issues of market access and to
determine sub-sectoral competitiveness.<o:p></o:p></span></div>
<div style="-webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; background: white; box-sizing: border-box; font-variant-caps: normal; font-variant-ligatures: normal; margin-bottom: 15.0pt; orphans: 2; text-decoration-color: initial; text-decoration-style: initial; widows: 2; word-spacing: 0px;">
<span style="color: #666666; font-family: "Arial",sans-serif;">Further,
the country’s relative strengths and domestic industry participation in
specific value chains should inform prioritisation of trade partner
negotiations. At present, the Commerce Ministry reaches out to the industry for
inputs only after the country has initiated trade discussions — this mechanism
largely remains ineffective as it fails to solicit detailed and usable
submissions within predefined timelines.<o:p></o:p></span></div>
<div style="-webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; background: white; box-sizing: border-box; font-variant-caps: normal; font-variant-ligatures: normal; margin-bottom: 15.0pt; orphans: 2; text-decoration-color: initial; text-decoration-style: initial; widows: 2; word-spacing: 0px;">
<span style="color: #666666; font-family: "Arial",sans-serif;">To
ensure that there is coherence in the decision-making process, the Government
should explore the establishment of a nodal body, on the lines of the erstwhile
Trade and Economic Relations Committee (TERC) of the Cabinet. Such a body can
enable consultative decision-making, efficient inter-ministerial coordination
and better definition of the country’s trade priorities and strategies.<o:p></o:p></span></div>
<div style="-webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; background: white; box-sizing: border-box; font-variant-caps: normal; font-variant-ligatures: normal; margin-bottom: 15.0pt; orphans: 2; text-decoration-color: initial; text-decoration-style: initial; widows: 2; word-spacing: 0px;">
<em style="box-sizing: border-box;"><span style="color: #666666; font-family: "Arial",sans-serif;">(Kalawatia and Priyadarshi work at Koan
Advisory Group, New Delhi. The views expressed here are personal.)</span></em><span style="color: #666666; font-family: "Arial",sans-serif;"><o:p></o:p></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<!--EndFragment--><br /></div>
vivan sharanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14813392915753123620noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1739355480870226467.post-91947642177169893902019-12-08T13:14:00.004+05:302019-12-08T13:14:33.307+05:30"India should now get its trade negotiation act together", Vivan Sharan, The Mint, 07 November 2019<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<div style="-webkit-tap-highlight-color: rgba(0, 0, 0, 0); backface-visibility: hidden; background-color: white; color: #212121; font-family: "PT Serif Regular", serif; font-size: 18px; line-height: 28px; list-style-type: none; outline: none; overflow-wrap: break-word; padding: 8px 20px;">
<a href="https://www.livemint.com/opinion/online-views/india-should-now-get-its-trade-negotiation-act-together-11573059286317.html">https://www.livemint.com/opinion/online-views/india-should-now-get-its-trade-negotiation-act-together-11573059286317.html</a></div>
<div style="-webkit-tap-highlight-color: rgba(0, 0, 0, 0); backface-visibility: hidden; background-color: white; color: #212121; font-family: "PT Serif Regular", serif; font-size: 18px; line-height: 28px; list-style-type: none; outline: none; overflow-wrap: break-word; padding: 8px 20px;">
India opted out of the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP) negotiations this week. A mega free trade agreement (FTA) in the works, the RCEP currently comprises ten countries of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (Asean), along with Australia, China, Japan, New Zealand and South Korea. In addition to conventional trade-related issues, like custom duties and dispute settlement mechanisms, an imminent RCEP agreement is expected to cover a wide range of new areas, including intellectual property, competition and e-commerce. India had participated in the RCEP process since its inception in 2013, dedicating a significant part of its limited state capacity to extensive trade negotiations. Therefore, India’s late decision to exit the RCEP took many observers by surprise.</div>
<div style="-webkit-tap-highlight-color: rgba(0, 0, 0, 0); backface-visibility: hidden; background-color: white; color: #212121; font-family: "PT Serif Regular", serif; font-size: 18px; line-height: 28px; list-style-type: none; outline: none; overflow-wrap: break-word; padding: 8px 20px;">
The long-term economic trade-offs in complex trade deals are never easy to quantify, chiefly because markets are dynamic. For instance, while India can leverage its strengths in services trade with RCEP members today, lack of new innovations may change this paradigm in the future. And India’s situation is not unique. The remaining RCEP countries must equally confront such uncertainties while negotiating with the rest. China may not remain the manufacturing hub of the world, South Korean chaebols may falter, Japan may not be able to solve its demographic challenges, and so on. In such circumstances, it is useful to assess India’s decision through a wider strategic prism.</div>
<div style="-webkit-tap-highlight-color: rgba(0, 0, 0, 0); backface-visibility: hidden; background-color: white; color: #212121; font-family: "PT Serif Regular", serif; font-size: 18px; line-height: 28px; list-style-type: none; outline: none; overflow-wrap: break-word; padding: 8px 20px;">
First, if India remains outside the RCEP, it will need to redouble efforts to ensure that the World Trade Organization (WTO) functions smoothly and in the country’s favour. However, the US has lately held the WTO to ransom through its veto power—for instance, by demanding sweeping institutional changes in exchange for approving appointments at the WTO’s appellate body. Another US demand is a change in the “developing country" status accorded to emerging economies like India. While graduating to developed country status within the WTO may initially seem like a cause for celebration, what it means is that India will no longer receive special and differential treatment on account of its development needs. It will have to compete on a level-playing field with industrialized nations.</div>
<div style="-webkit-tap-highlight-color: rgba(0, 0, 0, 0); backface-visibility: hidden; background-color: white; color: #212121; font-family: "PT Serif Regular", serif; font-size: 18px; line-height: 28px; list-style-type: none; outline: none; overflow-wrap: break-word; padding: 8px 20px;">
India must reject American demands by building a consensus among developing nations on viable counter proposals. Simply saying “no", as it did in the case of the RCEP, will not yield anything substantive.</div>
<div style="-webkit-tap-highlight-color: rgba(0, 0, 0, 0); backface-visibility: hidden; background-color: white; color: #212121; font-family: "PT Serif Regular", serif; font-size: 18px; line-height: 28px; list-style-type: none; outline: none; overflow-wrap: break-word; padding: 8px 20px;">
However, by leaving the RCEP, India has lost some of the goodwill it requires to mobilize forces effectively at the WTO, especially among its regional Asian allies. India’s inability to champion development is a relatively recent phenomenon in global trade. For several decades, leading up to the Marrakesh Agreement that established the WTO, the country was at the helm of the Group of 77 developing nations. Today, it is scarcely able to engender a consensus even on softer issues like cross-border e-commerce, whereas dozens of developing countries have found common cause with related proposals of developed countries.</div>
<div style="-webkit-tap-highlight-color: rgba(0, 0, 0, 0); backface-visibility: hidden; background-color: white; color: #212121; font-family: "PT Serif Regular", serif; font-size: 18px; line-height: 28px; list-style-type: none; outline: none; overflow-wrap: break-word; padding: 8px 20px;">
Second, India must enhance its ability to negotiate bilateral deals if it wants to stay out of plurilateral engagements like the RCEP. Here, it must take a leaf out of China’s playbook. As far as trade spats go, the US-China trade dispute may be the most shrill and high-stakes one yet. However, both countries are simultaneously engaging each other in several forums, recognizing the exigencies of a global system that has enmeshed them. Their multi-pronged engagement includes discussions on e-commerce at the WTO within a group of 76 countries, excluding India. At the last G20 Summit, the US and China were also among the 24 co-signatories to the “Osaka Track", reinvigorating their commitment on e-commerce. India, however, stayed outside this conversation too.</div>
<div style="-webkit-tap-highlight-color: rgba(0, 0, 0, 0); backface-visibility: hidden; background-color: white; color: #212121; font-family: "PT Serif Regular", serif; font-size: 18px; line-height: 28px; list-style-type: none; outline: none; overflow-wrap: break-word; padding: 8px 20px;">
Importantly, China does not share all of the US’s interests on e-commerce. It diverges on several fronts. For instance, it has an internet firewall that keeps the likes of Google and Facebook out of its domestic market. It also imposes data localization requirements antithetical to the logic of seamless cross-border e-commerce. China also has a poor track record of protecting intellectual property. Yet, Beijing recognizes the value of bilateral conversations. If nothing else, staying engaged with its trading partners sparks regular internal reforms. At the 66th meeting of its State Council last month, China enacted deep regulatory changes, effectively strengthening its intellectual property regime to encourage innovation-linked investments. This is in stark contrast with India, which has been unable to capitalize on the US-China dispute, despite a two-year window.</div>
<div style="-webkit-tap-highlight-color: rgba(0, 0, 0, 0); backface-visibility: hidden; background-color: white; color: #212121; font-family: "PT Serif Regular", serif; font-size: 18px; line-height: 28px; list-style-type: none; outline: none; overflow-wrap: break-word; padding: 8px 20px;">
Last, if India decides to join the RCEP at a later date—an option it can still exercise—it must anticipate suboptimal outcomes. India did not participate in the initial stages of the Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (Trips) negotiations during WTO’s Uruguay Round between 1986 and 1993. When it eventually joined—as it is likely to do in the case of the RCEP—the key pillars of the agreement had already been established. There are several such instances of delay or inertia inadvertently undermining the national interest. If negotiating strategies don’t improve, history may repeat itself. That would be unfortunate.</div>
<div style="-webkit-tap-highlight-color: rgba(0, 0, 0, 0); backface-visibility: hidden; background-color: white; color: #212121; font-family: "PT Serif Regular", serif; font-size: 18px; line-height: 28px; list-style-type: none; outline: none; overflow-wrap: break-word; padding: 8px 20px;">
Vivan Sharan <em style="-webkit-tap-highlight-color: rgba(0, 0, 0, 0); backface-visibility: hidden; list-style-type: none; margin: 0px; outline: none; overflow-wrap: break-word; padding: 0px;">is a partner at Koan Advisory Group, New Delhi These are the author’s personal views</em></div>
</div>
vivan sharanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14813392915753123620noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1739355480870226467.post-27194994334468417702019-12-08T13:12:00.002+05:302019-12-08T13:12:30.596+05:30"Ride the tech wave", Megha Patnaik and Vivan Sharan, The Pioneer, 01 November 2019<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<a href="https://www.dailypioneer.com/2019/columnists/ride-the-tech-wave.html?fbclid=IwAR2IZ5j0jOEhfNgo-bwiCKFH_oOc03l0_JY5gKr4v0lKhNocz3LwrUkRbjE">https://www.dailypioneer.com/2019/columnists/ride-the-tech-wave.html?fbclid=IwAR2IZ5j0jOEhfNgo-bwiCKFH_oOc03l0_JY5gKr4v0lKhNocz3LwrUkRbjE</a><br />
<br />
<span style="background-color: white; color: #666666; font-family: "Fira Sans Condensed", sans-serif; font-size: 16px;">Internet adoption has grown manifold in India and at a stunning pace. According to Ericsson, the average domestic smartphone user consumes around 10 gigabytes of data per month, a stark increase from less than a gigabyte five years ago. Consequently, the growth of the digital economy has outpaced that of traditional industries, providing consumers access to seamless communications and diverse content. However, India employs an inconsistent mix of responsive and legacy regulations towards such technological developments.</span><br />
<span style="background-color: white; color: #666666; font-family: "Fira Sans Condensed", sans-serif; font-size: 16px;"><br /></span>
<div style="background-color: white; box-sizing: border-box; color: #666666; font-family: "Fira Sans Condensed", sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin-bottom: 20px;">
For instance, a prominent divergence is visible in the progressive approach of the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (TRAI) towards interconnection regulations in communications markets and the regressive approach adopted by executive branches of Government towards licensing of Intellectual Property Rights (IPRs) in content markets. TRAI’s approach encouraged technology transition for the telecom industry and facilitated communications for consumers, while the executive branch is delaying technology transition in content industries and creating barriers for investment in quality content that consumers can now access online.</div>
<div style="background-color: white; box-sizing: border-box; color: #666666; font-family: "Fira Sans Condensed", sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin-bottom: 20px;">
Let’s consider the progressive approach adopted in telecom first. In 2017, TRAI reduced Interconnection Usage Charges (IUC) from 14 paisa per minute to six paisa per minute to encourage transition from legacy 2G and 3G networks to modern 4G networks. Interconnection lets telcos access each other’s networks and the IUC is a compensatory mechanism to enable this. Older 2G and 3G networks are based on circuit switching technology, which requires a dedicated connection for the period of communication between two networks.</div>
<div style="background-color: white; box-sizing: border-box; color: #666666; font-family: "Fira Sans Condensed", sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin-bottom: 20px;">
Costs of interconnection reduce dramatically in modern Internet Protocol (IP) based 4G networks. IP-based networks rely on packet-switching that allows rerouting of communications from capacity deficit parts of a network to parts with a surplus. This dynamic optimisation reduces network congestion and improves efficiency, reducing costs. A lower IUC dilutes the incentives to run legacy networks and encourages transition to the superior technology. This has led to greater consumer access, borne out by the spike in data consumption in the country.</div>
<div style="background-color: white; box-sizing: border-box; color: #666666; font-family: "Fira Sans Condensed", sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin-bottom: 20px;">
The increased data consumption enabled by IP-based networks has driven demand for online streaming services. This is best illustrated by the fact that over 90 per cent of music is consumed digitally today. More than 80 per cent of total music record label revenues come from digital music and streaming grew by 50 per cent in 2018 to reach 150 million listeners, excluding YouTube. This growing preference for online services over previously available television (TV) and radio broadcasts reflects consumers’ access to a wider choice of content, personalisation and interactivity.</div>
<div style="background-color: white; box-sizing: border-box; color: #666666; font-family: "Fira Sans Condensed", sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin-bottom: 20px;">
TV and radio broadcasting are over-reliant on advertising revenues, which has led to dissemination of homogenised and formulaic content. The primary benefit online subscription services provide is access to niche, personalised content, that users are willing to pay for. This is clearly seen in both the explosive popularity of online platforms providing streaming services and the centering of new business models around personalisation. With traditional broadcasting, latent demand for a wide variety of content is seldom realised, given the incentives for broadcasters to cater to popular preferences. Online platforms employ new technologies to incorporate user feedback and facilitate better matching of listeners and viewers with content producers, thus changing the shape of the content market.</div>
<div style="background-color: white; box-sizing: border-box; color: #666666; font-family: "Fira Sans Condensed", sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin-bottom: 20px;">
On the other side of this new and exciting online content market, a segment of smaller players have a known history of struggling to monetise their niche content. For smaller producers creating vernacular content, demand may be in pockets or scattered. For example, communities of overseas Indians have demand and willingness to pay for quality music content in several regional languages, but the smaller labels that produce this type of content have not found means to reach these audiences through traditional channels. Such labels now have an opportunity via online platforms to reach users in dispersed domestic and global markets.</div>
<div style="background-color: white; box-sizing: border-box; color: #666666; font-family: "Fira Sans Condensed", sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin-bottom: 20px;">
With smaller producers being able to monetise their content, online platforms will be able to take more diverse content to their consumers to match individual tastes. Leveraging the key benefits of the new technology improves both sides of the market.</div>
<div style="background-color: white; box-sizing: border-box; color: #666666; font-family: "Fira Sans Condensed", sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin-bottom: 20px;">
However, policymakers appear oblivious to the benefits of new technologies and lean towards legacy regulations. Public policy decision-makers are considering imposition of licencing rules made for TV and radio broadcasts to online streaming. Section 31(D) of India’s copyright law, also known as the provision for statutory licencing, is meant to provide TV and radio stations hassle-free acquisition of music for broadcasting. Policymakers are considering extension of this provision to internet streaming, highlighting a fundamental gap in their understanding of the market barriers today and the opportunities that new technologies offer.</div>
<div style="background-color: white; box-sizing: border-box; color: #666666; font-family: "Fira Sans Condensed", sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin-bottom: 20px;">
Copyright law is generally designed to help content owners licence their works for public dissemination at market-determined prices. Voluntary licencing under the law is a key mechanism to enable such access while protecting the commercial and moral interests of content owners. Section 31(D) was specifically created as an exception to voluntary licensing, to provide wider access to content through traditional broadcasting. This meant that TV and radio broadcasters could seek statutory licencing in the event that voluntary licencing negotiations with content owners failed.</div>
<div style="background-color: white; box-sizing: border-box; color: #666666; font-family: "Fira Sans Condensed", sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin-bottom: 20px;">
Involuntary or statutory licensing is a legacy framework that was only relevant when radio and television industries were developing. Without radio stations being able to source music, consumers did not have access to content. The original objectives of consumer access have been met. TRAI reported All India Radio (AIR) as having 420 radio stations in 2017, covering almost 92 per cent of the country by area and more than 99.2 per cent of the country’s population. India has 369 private radio stations on top, including in smaller cities and towns. In addition, the push by TRAI for adoption of modern network technologies has led to an exponential jump in access to content relative to when TV and radio were dominant. Today, when consumer access is no longer a problem, extending the provision of statutory licensing to internet streaming is not justified.</div>
<div style="background-color: white; box-sizing: border-box; color: #666666; font-family: "Fira Sans Condensed", sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin-bottom: 20px;">
Although consumers have wide access to mainstream content, the pain point that new technology addresses is consumers’ access to variety. Fully leveraging the technology for personalised content provision will transform the listening experience for consumers, offering them music that they do not even know they may enjoy. India’s vast cultural diversity that currently has limited reach can potentially change the music market in a way that listeners cannot imagine going back to old ways of accessing content.</div>
<div style="background-color: white; box-sizing: border-box; color: #666666; font-family: "Fira Sans Condensed", sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin-bottom: 20px;">
Involuntary or statutory licensing will only prove to be a backdoor for global music streaming giants to access vast vernacular music libraries of Indian music labels for a pittance. By extending 31(D) to online streaming platforms, policymakers will inadvertently keep the local industry from using exclusivity as a negotiating chip for earning greater value in a market where content supply is not a challenge. This move would limit the future investments of smaller producers who have already suffered under the previous regime where mainstream content dominated. It will reduce the impact of new technologies on improving the experience of listeners. </div>
<div style="background-color: white; box-sizing: border-box; color: #666666; font-family: "Fira Sans Condensed", sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin-bottom: 20px;">
At a time when India is struggling to stimulate economic activity, it is important to adopt a principles-based approach to governing technology that has the potential to generate growth. TRAI led the way in telecom markets, leveraging technological innovation. Decision-makers must learn from each other and actively desist from path-dependence and legacy regulations, especially in rapidly evolving digital markets.</div>
<div style="background-color: white; box-sizing: border-box; color: #666666; font-family: "Fira Sans Condensed", sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin-bottom: 20px;">
<em style="box-sizing: border-box;">(Patnaik is an Esya Centre Fellow and Assistant Professor at the Indian Statistical Institute and Sharan is an Advisor to the Esya Centre and Partner at Koan Advisory.)</em></div>
</div>
vivan sharanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14813392915753123620noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1739355480870226467.post-75676515549157043462019-12-08T13:07:00.003+05:302019-12-08T13:07:50.606+05:30"RCEP churn: Protecting Indian dairy from itself", Vivan Sharan, Financial Express, 11 October 2019<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><a href="https://www.financialexpress.com/opinion/rcep-churn-protecting-indian-dairy-from-itself/1732325/?fbclid=IwAR1lSUzLHnpXT4MonrttC6HHrboHnjRO861tglWTjE7N1L0J65hecUbO1uI">https://www.financialexpress.com/opinion/rcep-churn-protecting-indian-dairy-from-itself/1732325/?fbclid=IwAR1lSUzLHnpXT4MonrttC6HHrboHnjRO861tglWTjE7N1L0J65hecUbO1uI</a></span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">India’s largest dairy cooperatives have resisted free trade agreements (FTAs) with countries such as New Zealand and trade blocs like the EU in the past, and are staunch opponents to the proposed Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP). The RCEP is an imminent FTA between 16 countries including India, China, Australia, New Zealand, Japan South Korea and members of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN). The RCEP will cover several economic sectors, however, concerns around dairy imports are key to India’s strategic calculus.</span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span>
<div style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial; border: 0px; box-sizing: border-box; line-height: 28px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px 0px 20px; vertical-align: baseline;">
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">India accounts for a fifth of global milk production but holds a negligible market share of global dairy exports. Conversely, most RCEP countries are import dependent, making the combined dairy market ripe for Indian exports, that is if the production capabilities in the country were to mature in the future. However, large dairy cooperatives in India seem to fear a narrowing of their domestic market share to high value imports from New Zealand and Australia; and, therefore, seem far from prepared to face competition in potentially lucrative export markets such as China, Japan and South Korea.</span></div>
<div style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial; border: 0px; box-sizing: border-box; line-height: 28px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px 0px 20px; vertical-align: baseline;">
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">India’s self-sufficiency in milk production is the result of an overall focus on increasing agricultural production following Independence. ‘Operation Flood’ which played a catalytic role in dairy development, was akin to the Green Revolution in many ways. Input costs were indirectly controlled through state-supported cooperatives like Amul, and competing imports were banned outright. The political will of leaders like Lal Bahadur Shastri complemented the vision of technocrats like Amul’s Verghese Kurien, and created perfect conditions for boosting milk production. Unfortunately, this initial production focus has hardwired rigidities that are hard to shake off.</span></div>
<div style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial; border: 0px; box-sizing: border-box; line-height: 28px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px 0px 20px; vertical-align: baseline;">
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">Consider some takeaways from the National Action Plan for Dairy Development prepared by the government in 2018, in relation to the RCEP debate. The plan is unequivocal on two fronts. India’s cattle numbers cannot increase substantially, chiefly because of the immense ecological pressure from water-use and cattle-feed. This puts the onus on improved productivity to expand future production. Additionally, less than half of the marketable production surplus is handled by the organised sector. Cooperatives and private dairies share this organised sector equally, and must, therefore, share responsibilities for addressing the productivity gap.</span></div>
<div style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial; border: 0px; box-sizing: border-box; line-height: 28px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px 0px 20px; vertical-align: baseline;">
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">Thus, both cooperatives and private dairies should participate equally in policy conversations. However, a handful of large cooperatives command asymmetric policy clout stemming from large production volumes. This is problematic on three counts.</span></div>
<div style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial; border: 0px; box-sizing: border-box; line-height: 28px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px 0px 20px; vertical-align: baseline;">
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">First, private sector dairies would undoubtedly benefit from an FTA if it leads to commercially meaningful opportunities for investors in the dairy value chain—particularly at the higher end—in differentiated products like cheese. Private dairies have built their processing capacities much faster than cooperatives despite their first-mover advantage. Global dairy majors like Danone and Lactalis consequently invested in mid-sized and large dairies in India. The market access provided by RCEP could be used to position India as a milk processing hub for Asia. And, at a time when domestic investments are waning across all segments of the economy, the RCEP would be a boon to private dairies. Low private sector awareness and lack of effort by state institutions to bridge such knowledge gaps, mean that the private sector has no real voice.</span></div>
<div style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial; border: 0px; box-sizing: border-box; line-height: 28px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px 0px 20px; vertical-align: baseline;">
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">Second, large cooperatives naturally attract politicians because of their scale and influence. Take Amul as an example—which sits atop 18 milk unions and where most union appointments are political. <a href="http://www.financialexpress.com/tag/congress/" style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial; box-sizing: border-box; color: #00599b; margin: 0px; outline: none; padding: 0px; text-decoration-line: none; vertical-align: baseline;" target="_blank">Congress</a> dominated the appointments of union heads until the mid 2000s when the <a href="http://www.financialexpress.com/tag/bharatiya-janata-party/" style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial; box-sizing: border-box; color: #00599b; margin: 0px; outline: none; padding: 0px; text-decoration-line: none; vertical-align: baseline;" target="_blank">BJP</a> began to wrest control. This inevitable political interest in large milk cooperatives generates perverse economic incentives. For instance, milk prices are often suppressed before elections to keep consumers happy, even if market dynamics dictate otherwise.</span></div>
<div style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial; border: 0px; box-sizing: border-box; line-height: 28px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px 0px 20px; vertical-align: baseline;">
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">Similarly, many cooperatives siphon off milk to private processors, while enjoying political patronage and protection. This is akin to pilferage of Food Corporation of India stocks wherein cereals are bought by agents of the state at Minimum Support Prices, and then illegally sold to private food processors for a song.</span></div>
<div style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial; border: 0px; box-sizing: border-box; line-height: 28px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px 0px 20px; vertical-align: baseline;">
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">Last, the unit economics of most Indian dairies make little sense. According to the Food and Agriculture Organisation, the global average dairy herd size is 2.4 and according to the National Dairy Development Board, Indian cows average 3 litres of yield. Mother dairy sells one litre of milk for around Rs 44. Since the strength of the cooperative narrative is devolution of profits to the producer, let’s assume full transfer from consumer to producer per litre of milk sold. Feeding bovines typically accounts for 70% of the price at which milk is procured by cooperatives. This leaves the producer with around Rs 100 in hand, which is also optimistic given all liberal assumptions made here.</span></div>
<div style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial; border: 0px; box-sizing: border-box; line-height: 28px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px 0px 20px; vertical-align: baseline;">
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">In fact, the National Action Plan estimates monthly average producer income to be Rs 516 per month! This is roughly equivalent to the daily minimum wages prescribed for unskilled workers in the National Capital Territory of Delhi. The representatives of large cooperatives defend these paltry earnings of their producers.</span></div>
<div style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial; border: 0px; box-sizing: border-box; line-height: 28px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px 0px 20px; vertical-align: baseline;">
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">In 1988, during a speech at the ‘Shastri Indo-Canadian Institute’, Verghese Kurien stated that “there is plenty of room for competition and our only request is that it be a fair competition”. Twenty years on, it seems we are still trying to grapple with this idea of fairness. Whether or not India joins the RCEP and accedes to demands from competing dairy powerhouses is almost a secondary question. We should first explore the reasons why most of the private sector is always mute in FTA discussions, why cooperatives inevitably become political, and why we are all comfortable with the average dairy farmer earning less than the cost of coffee at hotels where governments typically conduct RCEP negotiations.</span></div>
<div style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial; border: 0px; box-sizing: border-box; line-height: 28px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px 0px 20px; vertical-align: baseline;">
<em style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial; border: 0px; box-sizing: border-box; margin: 0px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;"><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial; border: 0px; box-sizing: border-box; font-weight: 700; margin: 0px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;"><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">(The author is Partner, Koan Advisory Group, New Delhi. Views are personal)</span></span></em></div>
</div>
vivan sharanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14813392915753123620noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1739355480870226467.post-38047135054343769432019-12-08T12:57:00.000+05:302019-12-08T12:57:29.306+05:30Chapter on "Financial Architecture and Financial Flows: BRICS and the G7", by Vivan Sharan and Vikash Gautam, September 2019<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<div style="background-color: white; border: 0px; color: #333333; font-family: "Helvetica Neue", Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; font-stretch: inherit; font-variant-east-asian: inherit; font-variant-numeric: inherit; line-height: inherit; margin-bottom: 0.5em; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
This book analyzes the state of global governance in the current geopolitical environment. It evaluates the main challenges and discusses potential opportunities for compromise in international cooperation. The book’s analysis is based on the universal criteria of global political stability and the UN framework of sustainable development. By examining various global problems, including global economic inequality, legal and political aspects of access to resources, international trade, and climate change, as well as the attendant global economic and political confrontations between key global actors, the book identifies a growing crisis and the pressing need to transform the current system of global governance. In turn, it discusses various instruments, measures and international regulation mechanisms that can foster international cooperation in order to overcome global problems.</div>
<div style="background-color: white; border: 0px; color: #333333; font-family: "Helvetica Neue", Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; font-stretch: inherit; font-variant-east-asian: inherit; font-variant-numeric: inherit; line-height: inherit; margin-bottom: 0.5em; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
Addressing a broad range of topics, e.g. the international environmental regime, global financial problems, issues in connection with the energy transition, and the role of BRICS countries in global governance, the book will appeal to scholars in international relations, economics and law, as well as policy-makers in government offices and international organizations.</div>
<div style="background-color: white; border: 0px; color: #333333; font-family: "Helvetica Neue", Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; font-stretch: inherit; font-variant-east-asian: inherit; font-variant-numeric: inherit; line-height: inherit; margin-bottom: 0.5em; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
<br /></div>
<div style="background-color: white; border: 0px; color: #333333; font-family: "Helvetica Neue", Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; font-stretch: inherit; font-variant-east-asian: inherit; font-variant-numeric: inherit; line-height: inherit; margin-bottom: 0.5em; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
<a href="https://www.springer.com/gp/book/9783030230913?fbclid=IwAR1XxA8P5seamXjkFcFJPjQXP8mlmxxDq9hvAg-WCgm1fv3iMDc21sBYcYQ">https://www.springer.com/gp/book/9783030230913?fbclid=IwAR1XxA8P5seamXjkFcFJPjQXP8mlmxxDq9hvAg-WCgm1fv3iMDc21sBYcYQ</a></div>
</div>
vivan sharanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14813392915753123620noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1739355480870226467.post-34241385059520269892019-06-29T12:03:00.003+05:302019-06-29T12:03:54.829+05:30Vivan Sharan speaks to NewsX on India-US trade relations, 27 June 2019<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<iframe width="320" height="266" class="YOUTUBE-iframe-video" data-thumbnail-src="https://i.ytimg.com/vi/1H9v9g84ZGQ/0.jpg" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/1H9v9g84ZGQ?feature=player_embedded" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe></div>
<br /></div>
vivan sharanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14813392915753123620noreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1739355480870226467.post-31724289001147231162019-06-29T12:02:00.001+05:302019-06-29T12:02:59.109+05:30Vivan Sharan speaks on e-commerce at a national seminar convened by RIS and CII, 5 June 2019<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiNlTpYp8_YtYyNdssWfTO37TUoTjKOiIYVFJNVimaqUdfGexHAGvyVcjUzFmzHWbZTKxkkG0nZ-dDlO76TN_ZIH4TjBsAE5PhFKIS7K-EikSirQtFnxBbKkOajoSICtESgidk3drr2EWim/s1600/D8S03bfXoAUFMYU.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" data-original-height="853" data-original-width="1280" height="425" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiNlTpYp8_YtYyNdssWfTO37TUoTjKOiIYVFJNVimaqUdfGexHAGvyVcjUzFmzHWbZTKxkkG0nZ-dDlO76TN_ZIH4TjBsAE5PhFKIS7K-EikSirQtFnxBbKkOajoSICtESgidk3drr2EWim/s640/D8S03bfXoAUFMYU.jpg" width="640" /></a></div>
<br /></div>
vivan sharanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14813392915753123620noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1739355480870226467.post-67738638352988713882019-06-29T12:00:00.003+05:302019-06-29T12:00:50.256+05:30Vivan Sharan speaks to NewsX on the economic agenda for NDA 3.0, 31 May 2019<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<iframe width="320" height="266" class="YOUTUBE-iframe-video" data-thumbnail-src="https://i.ytimg.com/vi/aZI8pm4jNvM/0.jpg" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/aZI8pm4jNvM?feature=player_embedded" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe></div>
<br /></div>
vivan sharanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14813392915753123620noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1739355480870226467.post-18493721383422946462019-06-29T11:51:00.000+05:302019-06-29T11:51:09.388+05:30Let’s not miss this opportunity to revive ‘Make in India’ , Oped by Vivan Sharan, Mint, 21 May 2019<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<div style="backface-visibility: hidden; color: #212121; font-family: "PT Serif Regular", serif; font-size: 18px; line-height: 28px; list-style-type: none; outline: none; overflow-wrap: break-word; padding: 8px 20px; text-size-adjust: auto;">
India’s next government is poised to inherit a troubled economy. Several indicators point to a reduction in demand, including for packaged consumer goods and two-wheelers which had earlier seen consistent growth. Conscientious policymakers have consequently begun to highlight that this lack of demand is a symptom of a deeper malaise—namely, lack of income growth for a majority of Indians. A vicious cycle like this can only be remedied by resuscitating economic activity wherever possible. As far as manufacturing is concerned, the “Make in India" programme has thus far been unsuccessful in catalysing such activity.</div>
<div style="backface-visibility: hidden; color: #212121; font-family: "PT Serif Regular", serif; font-size: 18px; line-height: 28px; list-style-type: none; outline: none; overflow-wrap: break-word; padding: 8px 20px; text-size-adjust: auto;">
A large thrust of “Make in India" has been on localizing mobile phone manufacturing. Trade metrics, however, paint a dismal picture. Broadly, mobile manufacturing entails two steps—the higher-value activity of making components and the lower-value assembly of these. Traders can import parts and assemble them locally, or import ready-to-use phones, depending on relative advantages under prevailing import duty regimes. While imports of fully-built mobile phones have reduced substantially over the last five years, imports of components has risen manifold. Specifically, imports of ready-to-use phones on which India imposes 20% duty have fallen 80% from<span class="Apple-converted-space"> </span><span class="Apple-converted-space"> </span><span class="webrupee" style="backface-visibility: hidden; font-family: none; list-style-type: none; margin: 0px; outline: none; overflow-wrap: break-word; padding: 0px;">₹</span>47,439 crore in 2014-15 to<span class="Apple-converted-space"> </span><span class="Apple-converted-space"> </span><span class="webrupee" style="backface-visibility: hidden; font-family: none; list-style-type: none; margin: 0px; outline: none; overflow-wrap: break-word; padding: 0px;">₹</span>9,592 crore in 2018-19 (until February). However, imports of mobile components rose by around 116% from<span class="Apple-converted-space"> </span><span class="Apple-converted-space"> </span><span class="webrupee" style="backface-visibility: hidden; font-family: none; list-style-type: none; margin: 0px; outline: none; overflow-wrap: break-word; padding: 0px;">₹</span>47,011 crore in 2014-15 to<span class="Apple-converted-space"> </span><span class="Apple-converted-space"> </span><span class="webrupee" style="backface-visibility: hidden; font-family: none; list-style-type: none; margin: 0px; outline: none; overflow-wrap: break-word; padding: 0px;">₹</span>1.02 trillion in 2018-19 (until February). It thus seems an “Assemble in India" paradigm has emerged that serves the interests of companies that only wish to make nominal investments in local supply chains for trading profits, and not for manufacturing value addition.Typically, assembly does not account for more than 5-6% of a smartphone’s value. Lack of local value addition is worrying not just because it militates against the logic of “Make in India", but because it’s directly related to lack of income growth in India’s economy.</div>
<div style="backface-visibility: hidden; color: #212121; font-family: "PT Serif Regular", serif; font-size: 18px; line-height: 28px; list-style-type: none; outline: none; overflow-wrap: break-word; padding: 8px 20px; text-size-adjust: auto;">
A sharp contraction in exports of mobile phones from India worsens the outlined challenges. Mobile phone exports peaked in 2012-13 at<span class="Apple-converted-space"> </span><span class="Apple-converted-space"> </span><span class="webrupee" style="backface-visibility: hidden; font-family: none; list-style-type: none; margin: 0px; outline: none; overflow-wrap: break-word; padding: 0px;">₹</span>14,487 crore. By 2018-19, they had fallen to under<span class="Apple-converted-space"> </span><span class="Apple-converted-space"> </span><span class="webrupee" style="backface-visibility: hidden; font-family: none; list-style-type: none; margin: 0px; outline: none; overflow-wrap: break-word; padding: 0px;">₹</span>9,000 crore. That is, imported parts were not used to make complete products for re-export. Instead, these component imports fuelled a trading and assembly ecosystem which contributes very little value locally. Indian consumption demand, then, is not doing much to drive domestic income growth.</div>
<div style="backface-visibility: hidden; color: #212121; font-family: "PT Serif Regular", serif; font-size: 18px; line-height: 28px; list-style-type: none; outline: none; overflow-wrap: break-word; padding: 8px 20px; text-size-adjust: auto;">
Evidently, “Make in India" has been limited in ambition and scope. Its vision follows from an outsize focus on erecting tariff barriers to protect domestic industry, instead of incentivizing manufacturing competitiveness through tax breaks, infrastructural support and other structural interventions. A similar tariff-led approach failed to catalyse the local manufacture of solar cells, the technologies of which have evolved rapidly like phone technologies. Keeping up with the technology curve requires serious investments in local research and development, which high-tariff regimes do not encourage.</div>
<div style="backface-visibility: hidden; color: #212121; font-family: "PT Serif Regular", serif; font-size: 18px; line-height: 28px; list-style-type: none; outline: none; overflow-wrap: break-word; padding: 8px 20px; text-size-adjust: auto;">
India’s tariff-led approach is reminiscent of a bygone era of industrial policies. However, greater specialization of industrial production today means that countries must adopt holistic policies that address supply chain complexities. Instead, in 2016, India chose to adopt a simplistic Phased Manufacturing Programme (PMP) under “Make in India", to levy duties on component imports hoping to stem related merchandise inflows.</div>
<div style="backface-visibility: hidden; color: #212121; font-family: "PT Serif Regular", serif; font-size: 18px; line-height: 28px; list-style-type: none; outline: none; overflow-wrap: break-word; padding: 8px 20px; text-size-adjust: auto;">
The PMP is a sequential application of tariffs that are raised gradually for different mobile phone components. Lower-value parts such as battery packs and chargers are sought to be localized first, followed by higher-value components like display screens and cameras. However, the disadvantages of manufacturing in India, including acute infrastructural deficits, cannot be offset by high tariffs alone. This is already visible in import statistics relating to low-value components covered under the PMP’s first phase. More such components are being imported at cheaper rates, perhaps an indication of the large surplus capacity of Chinese companies, which dominate the Indian smartphone market.</div>
<div style="backface-visibility: hidden; color: #212121; font-family: "PT Serif Regular", serif; font-size: 18px; line-height: 28px; list-style-type: none; outline: none; overflow-wrap: break-word; padding: 8px 20px; text-size-adjust: auto;">
It could be argued that Chinese companies cannot similarly reduce costs on higher-value components. However, both the European Union and Japan have recently filed consultation requests at the World Trade Organization on the tariffs imposed by India on several ICT products, including ready-to-use phones and several assembly components covered under the PMP. Such consultations constitute the first step towards initiation of disputes at the WTO. Given that India had already committed to keeping its tariff levels at zero on such products prior to the notification of PMP, the programme may have a short shelf life.</div>
<div style="backface-visibility: hidden; color: #212121; font-family: "PT Serif Regular", serif; font-size: 18px; line-height: 28px; list-style-type: none; outline: none; overflow-wrap: break-word; padding: 8px 20px; text-size-adjust: auto;">
It is also worth highlighting the strategic opportunity India currently enjoys, wherein it can leverage the ongoing trade spat between the US and China to attract firms that may be looking to hedge bets and shift some manufacturing capacity out of China. However, lacklustre inward investment in manufacturing shows that such re-orientation is contingent on a re-balancing of incentives and tariffs under “Make in India". The next government could begin to address such concerns with an immediate impact assessment of the PMP, particularly since the success of “Make in India" and income growth in the economy are correlated.</div>
<div style="backface-visibility: hidden; color: #212121; font-family: "PT Serif Regular", serif; font-size: 18px; line-height: 28px; list-style-type: none; outline: none; overflow-wrap: break-word; padding: 8px 20px; text-size-adjust: auto;">
<em style="backface-visibility: hidden; list-style-type: none; margin: 0px; outline: none; overflow-wrap: break-word; padding: 0px;">Vivan Sharan is partner at Koan Advisory Group, New Delhi. These are the author’s personal views</em></div>
<div style="backface-visibility: hidden; color: #212121; font-family: "PT Serif Regular", serif; font-size: 18px; line-height: 28px; list-style-type: none; outline: none; overflow-wrap: break-word; padding: 8px 20px; text-size-adjust: auto;">
<em style="backface-visibility: hidden; list-style-type: none; margin: 0px; outline: none; overflow-wrap: break-word; padding: 0px;">Original Link: <a href="https://www.livemint.com/opinion/online-views/opinion-let-s-not-miss-this-opportunity-to-revive-make-in-india-1558457035205.html">https://www.livemint.com/opinion/online-views/opinion-let-s-not-miss-this-opportunity-to-revive-make-in-india-1558457035205.html</a></em></div>
</div>
vivan sharanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14813392915753123620noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1739355480870226467.post-9884209348821502852019-06-29T11:47:00.000+05:302019-06-29T11:47:32.777+05:30"The country’s copyright law requires a digital reboot", Oped by Vivan Sharan, Mint, April 2019<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<div style="-webkit-tap-highlight-color: rgba(0, 0, 0, 0); backface-visibility: hidden; background-color: white; color: #212121; font-family: "PT Serif Regular", serif; font-size: 18px; line-height: 28px; list-style-type: none; outline: none; overflow-wrap: break-word; padding: 8px 20px;">
Digital music giant Spotify, which entered the Indian market earlier this year, has already opened its account in local courts. Music behemoth Warner Music, a former investor in Spotify, has sued the company over a matter that promises to send ripples through India’s intellectual property regime. Specifically, Spotify recently invoked a statutory licensing provision (Section 31-D) under India’s Copyright Act, in an attempt to gain access to content owned by Warner Music, for redistribution. Warner Music has, in turn, filed an injunction at the Bombay High Court to prevent Spotify from accessing its content through such means.</div>
<div style="-webkit-tap-highlight-color: rgba(0, 0, 0, 0); backface-visibility: hidden; background-color: white; color: #212121; font-family: "PT Serif Regular", serif; font-size: 18px; line-height: 28px; list-style-type: none; outline: none; overflow-wrap: break-word; padding: 8px 20px;">
Statutory licensing serves as an exception to the exclusive economic rights of a copyright holder. This makes copyright licensing a minefield of litigation. The Spotify-Warner case will add a nebulous layer of jurisprudence to an economic area that merits more detailed legislative attention.</div>
<div style="-webkit-tap-highlight-color: rgba(0, 0, 0, 0); backface-visibility: hidden; background-color: white; color: #212121; font-family: "PT Serif Regular", serif; font-size: 18px; line-height: 28px; list-style-type: none; outline: none; overflow-wrap: break-word; padding: 8px 20px;">
India’s copyright regime is ostensibly based on the premise that “knowledge must be allowed to be disseminated". This public-interest rationale stems from a much-cited 2008 Supreme Court judgement. The ruling firmly established that the use of non-voluntary licences to enhance consumer access can be availed of by private entities, as well as public entities. However, the proliferation of information and communication technologies (ICTs) has changed the knowledge-dissemination paradigm. The dominance of digital markets necessitates a relook at the existing copyright regime—which is not a job for courts.</div>
<div style="-webkit-tap-highlight-color: rgba(0, 0, 0, 0); backface-visibility: hidden; background-color: white; color: #212121; font-family: "PT Serif Regular", serif; font-size: 18px; line-height: 28px; list-style-type: none; outline: none; overflow-wrap: break-word; padding: 8px 20px;">
Historically, music licensing in India has involved bundling of the underlying rights for musical composition, lyrics, performance, and even synchronization with the copyright for the sound recording. Until a seminal legislative amendment in 2012, which made such underlying rights “non-assignable", the wholesale transfer of rights to movie producers was a common practice. Such producers would then transfer these rights to record labels. This gave primary-rights owners, such as lyricists, performers and composers, no claim on future royalties. In many ways, the erstwhile regime was fit for a market where the music industry was primarily financed by the film industry, particularly Bollywood. However, the Bollywood-centricity of music markets is being disrupted by internet streaming.</div>
<div style="-webkit-tap-highlight-color: rgba(0, 0, 0, 0); backface-visibility: hidden; background-color: white; color: #212121; font-family: "PT Serif Regular", serif; font-size: 18px; line-height: 28px; list-style-type: none; outline: none; overflow-wrap: break-word; padding: 8px 20px;">
Market disruptions notwithstanding, judicial intervention is never far from upending accommodative legislative reform in India. In 2016, in another court case with large economic ramifications, the pre-2012 practice of transfer of rights was re-allowed for sound recordings that are not embedded in a cinematograph film. Primary-rights owners were dealt a blow through a judicial intervention that paid insufficient attention to changing market dynamics. Independent of the legal rigmarole, India’s music industry has managed to cross the<span class="webrupee" style="-webkit-tap-highlight-color: rgba(0, 0, 0, 0); backface-visibility: hidden; font-family: none; list-style-type: none; margin: 0px; outline: none; overflow-wrap: break-word; padding: 0px;">₹</span>1,000-crore mark in 2018, and need not play second fiddle to films forever. Through sustained growth of internet streaming revenues, the industry can become a force to reckon with in its own right.</div>
<div style="-webkit-tap-highlight-color: rgba(0, 0, 0, 0); backface-visibility: hidden; background-color: white; color: #212121; font-family: "PT Serif Regular", serif; font-size: 18px; line-height: 28px; list-style-type: none; outline: none; overflow-wrap: break-word; padding: 8px 20px;">
In fact, technology has helped several Indian industries overcome challenges stemming from static regulatory regimes. For instance, TV broadcasters in India have invested heavily in online video platforms to disseminate new content. Such investments will help them overcome a legacy of prescriptive economic regulations in the TV market. Similarly, in the case of the music industry, digital platforms will enable greater consumer reach, as well as product and service innovation, to maximize industry revenues.</div>
<div style="-webkit-tap-highlight-color: rgba(0, 0, 0, 0); backface-visibility: hidden; background-color: white; color: #212121; font-family: "PT Serif Regular", serif; font-size: 18px; line-height: 28px; list-style-type: none; outline: none; overflow-wrap: break-word; padding: 8px 20px;">
To its credit, the government recognized an untapped export potential of the audio and video industries last year and gave them “Champion Sector" status. The earning prospects of audio-visual exports are linked to the growth of digital markets.</div>
<div style="-webkit-tap-highlight-color: rgba(0, 0, 0, 0); backface-visibility: hidden; background-color: white; color: #212121; font-family: "PT Serif Regular", serif; font-size: 18px; line-height: 28px; list-style-type: none; outline: none; overflow-wrap: break-word; padding: 8px 20px;">
Several Indian industries, ranging from telecom to mining, have suffered the consequences of judicial overreach in economic matters. As a principle, such interventions should be curtailed to instances of discernible market failure. Moreover, digital markets are exceptional on several counts, necessitating that judicial interventions be narrow in scope. First, internet streaming does not rely on the use of scarce public spectrum, as television or radio broadcasting does. Second, the cost of switching between streaming services is negligible as it does not involve replacement of any equipment or distributors. And third, in theory, there can be no discrimination between large and small streaming businesses at the network level of the internet, thanks to network neutrality rules.</div>
<div style="-webkit-tap-highlight-color: rgba(0, 0, 0, 0); backface-visibility: hidden; background-color: white; color: #212121; font-family: "PT Serif Regular", serif; font-size: 18px; line-height: 28px; list-style-type: none; outline: none; overflow-wrap: break-word; padding: 8px 20px;">
Wisely, Indian legislators have held back from expanding the scope of statutory licensing from broadcasting to internet streaming. However, the department for promotion of industry and internal trade issued an “Office Memorandum" in 2016, seemingly attempting precisely this. While the legality and impact of the memorandum remains untested, it underlines a latent impulse to carry over legacy licensing constructs into the new economy. The Warner-Spotify dispute may heighten similar impulses within the judiciary, which seldom bothers to frame interventions in the context of market forces. The 17th Lok Sabha would do well to redraft the country’s copyright law to reflect the realities of digital markets, before other arms of the government begin to redefine public interest in this issue.</div>
<div style="-webkit-tap-highlight-color: rgba(0, 0, 0, 0); backface-visibility: hidden; background-color: white; color: #212121; font-family: "PT Serif Regular", serif; font-size: 18px; line-height: 28px; list-style-type: none; outline: none; overflow-wrap: break-word; padding: 8px 20px;">
<em style="-webkit-tap-highlight-color: rgba(0, 0, 0, 0); backface-visibility: hidden; list-style-type: none; margin: 0px; outline: none; overflow-wrap: break-word; padding: 0px;">These are the authors’ personal views</em></div>
<div style="-webkit-tap-highlight-color: rgba(0, 0, 0, 0); backface-visibility: hidden; background-color: white; color: #212121; font-family: "PT Serif Regular", serif; font-size: 18px; line-height: 28px; list-style-type: none; outline: none; overflow-wrap: break-word; padding: 8px 20px;">
Original Link: <a href="https://www.livemint.com/opinion/online-views/opinion-the-country-s-copyright-law-requires-a-digital-reboot-1555529741237.html">https://www.livemint.com/opinion/online-views/opinion-the-country-s-copyright-law-requires-a-digital-reboot-1555529741237.html</a></div>
</div>
vivan sharanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14813392915753123620noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1739355480870226467.post-54447320095826527822019-06-29T11:40:00.000+05:302019-06-29T11:40:04.075+05:30Vivan Sharan comments on India's proposed e-commerce policy, Forbes, February 2019<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<div style="box-sizing: border-box; caret-color: rgb(51, 51, 51); color: #333333; font-family: tabular-numbers, Georgia, Cambria, "Times New Roman", Times, serif; font-size: 18px; margin-bottom: 1.2rem; margin-top: 1.2rem; text-size-adjust: auto;">
Vivan Sharan, partner at<span class="Apple-converted-space"> </span><a data-ga-track="ExternalLink:http://www.koanadvisory.com/" href="http://www.koanadvisory.com/" rel="nofollow noopener" style="box-sizing: border-box; color: #003891; cursor: pointer; text-decoration-line: none;" target="_blank">Koan Advisory</a>, a consultancy that works with several foreign technology companies that are operating in India, says the<span style="box-sizing: border-box;"><span class="Apple-converted-space"> </span>policy does "a poor job" at understanding what drives innovation and value in the digital world.</span></div>
<div style="box-sizing: border-box; caret-color: rgb(51, 51, 51); color: #333333; font-family: tabular-numbers, Georgia, Cambria, "Times New Roman", Times, serif; font-size: 18px; margin-bottom: 1.2rem; margin-top: 1.2rem; text-size-adjust: auto;">
<span style="box-sizing: border-box;">"Innovation stems from the provision of incentives, the basic premise of the many intellectual property frameworks," he says. "If the state takes away such incentives by labeling itself the self-declared ‘trustee’ of all data generated domestically, which seems to be a central premise of the draft policy, it does no service to the growth of a digital India."</span></div>
<div style="box-sizing: border-box; caret-color: rgb(51, 51, 51); color: #333333; font-family: tabular-numbers, Georgia, Cambria, "Times New Roman", Times, serif; font-size: 18px; margin-bottom: 1.2rem; margin-top: 1.2rem; text-size-adjust: auto;">
Read more at: <a href="https://www.forbes.com/sites/meghabahree/2019/02/26/indias-battle-for-control-of-data-from-e-commerce/#3865a0484131">https://www.forbes.com/sites/meghabahree/2019/02/26/indias-battle-for-control-of-data-from-e-commerce/#3865a0484131</a></div>
</div>
vivan sharanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14813392915753123620noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1739355480870226467.post-22320841655390578892019-06-29T11:37:00.001+05:302019-06-29T11:37:08.746+05:30Vivan Sharan comments ion Apple's investments in India, Economic Times, Feb 2019<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<span style="background-color: white; caret-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: Arial; text-size-adjust: auto;">Industry experts believe India has huge potential as the next manufacturing hub for Apple, especially coupled with China-US geopolitical pressures. However, some believe gains will be symbiotic. “Frankly, this seems to be more of a miss for the Indian government, than the other way round,” says Vivan Sharan, partner, Koan Advisory, a public policy advisory which has Netflix and Amazon as its clients.<span class="Apple-converted-space"> </span></span><br style="background-color: white; caret-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: Arial; margin: 0px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; text-size-adjust: auto; vertical-align: baseline;" /><br />
<div style="background-color: white; caret-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: arial; margin: 0px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; text-size-adjust: auto; vertical-align: baseline;">
Read more at:<br style="background-color: transparent; margin: 0px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;" /><a href="https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/articleshow/68072349.cms?from=mdr&utm_source=contentofinterest&utm_medium=text&utm_campaign=cppst" style="background-color: transparent; color: #024d99; margin: 0px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; text-decoration-line: none; vertical-align: baseline;">//economictimes.indiatimes.com/articleshow/68072349.cms?from=mdr&utm_source=contentofinterest&utm_medium=text&utm_campaign=cppst</a></div>
</div>
vivan sharanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14813392915753123620noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1739355480870226467.post-86403677820263275342019-03-28T14:34:00.003+05:302019-03-28T14:34:47.354+05:30Why armed escalation is not of interest, Priyesh Mishra, The Pioneer, 4 March 2019<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
Original Link<br />
<br />
<a href="https://www.dailypioneer.com/2019/columnists/why-armed-escalation-is-not-of-interest.html">https://www.dailypioneer.com/2019/columnists/why-armed-escalation-is-not-of-interest.html</a><br />
<br />
<div style="background-color: white; box-sizing: border-box; color: #666666; font-family: "Fira Sans Condensed", sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin-bottom: 20px;">
<span style="box-sizing: border-box; font-weight: bolder;">Achieving intended outcomes by deploying escalation as a policy objective is dependent on external factors that are beyond effective control of parties to a conflict. Most of these factors may not exist in objective reality. This is exactly what India and Pakistan cannot afford</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; box-sizing: border-box; color: #666666; font-family: "Fira Sans Condensed", sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin-bottom: 20px;">
The chain of events following the <a href="https://www.dailypioneer.com/2019/top-stories/mayawati-accuses-bjp-of-indulging-in--petty--politics-after-pulwama-terror-attack.html" style="background-color: transparent; box-sizing: border-box; color: black; outline: none !important; text-decoration-line: none;">Pulwama attack</a> has plunged the security environment in the Indian sub-continent to its lowest point since Operation Parakram. Media-led clamour for retaliatory use of force against Pakistan has been gaining decibels ever since. And such has been the predictability of Government response in the post-truth world that limited use of military force was instantly foretold.</div>
<div style="background-color: white; box-sizing: border-box; color: #666666; font-family: "Fira Sans Condensed", sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin-bottom: 20px;">
However, the air strikes on Jaish-e-Mohammad training camps inside Pakistani territory came as a surprise to both Pakistan as well as analysts on both sides of the border. While India termed the strikes as “non-military” and “pre-emptive”, the use of sophisticated terminology did not deter Pakistan from carrying out retaliatory airstrikes, which led to an Indian Air Force (IAF) pilot and his Mig-21 being shot down.</div>
<div style="background-color: white; box-sizing: border-box; color: #666666; font-family: "Fira Sans Condensed", sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin-bottom: 20px;">
Amid claims and counter-claims of who inflicted how much damage, the two nuclear powers are once again on the verge of a full-fledged military conflict. What is appalling is that despite the criticality of the situation, prominent intelligentsia is suggesting that India must seek escalation. Their argument is that previous piecemeal military actions have failed to establish credible deterrence. While precedents may favour this argument, there is a fundamental flaw with the use of escalation as a deliberate policy measure — its propensity to spiral out of control.</div>
<div style="background-color: white; box-sizing: border-box; color: #666666; font-family: "Fira Sans Condensed", sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin-bottom: 20px;">
Numerous externalities impact the deviation between intended objectives and actual outcome of an escalatory action. To begin with, what should be the escalatory threshold? The subjectivity of escalatory threshold is one of the reasons that escalation is so difficult to manage and/or successfully exploit. Escalatory threshold may be symmetric — where a threshold is viewed similarly by both parties or asymmetric — situations where a threshold may loom large for one party but may seem obscure to the other. Second is the anticipated response from an adversary. Generally, when one party to a conflict crosses the escalatory threshold, it expects the other side to follow suit. Once again, this response may be symmetric, asymmetric or sometimes even absent.</div>
<div style="background-color: white; box-sizing: border-box; color: #666666; font-family: "Fira Sans Condensed", sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin-bottom: 20px;">
For example, during World War I, when the German Army introduced gas warfare, the Allied forces responded in equal measure, which kept the perceptive breach of escalatory threshold in balance. However, such a symmetric response may not be available if the prospect of equal retaliation seems less appealing or unavailable to the other party. For example, during Operation Desert Storm, frustrated by the sustained air strikes of the US-led forces, Iraq deliberately sought to escalate the conflict by firing ballistic missiles at Israel. The idea was to irk the coalition forces and draw them into war. However, Israel did not retaliate and coalition forces refused to be drawn into a premature full-blown war.</div>
<div style="background-color: white; box-sizing: border-box; color: #666666; font-family: "Fira Sans Condensed", sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin-bottom: 20px;">
To sum up, achieving intended outcomes by deploying escalation as a policy objective is dependent on external factors which are beyond effective control of parties to a conflict. Most of these factors are presumptive in nature and may or may not exist in objective reality. This increases the chance of a miscalculation exponentially and that is exactly what two nuclear-armed nations cannot afford.</div>
<div style="background-color: white; box-sizing: border-box; color: #666666; font-family: "Fira Sans Condensed", sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin-bottom: 20px;">
Even if India is certain to attain escalation dominance, it makes for little practical sense, given that stakes are higher for India as compared to Pakistan. An armed conflict at this point will have a multi-modal impact on India. The immediate casualty would be the economy. Wars are expensive. Just to add to perspective, the US federal price tag for the post 9/11 wars is pegged over $5.9 trillion till date (more than double of India’s GDP). The Indian economy is already facing headwinds from a rebound in global oil prices amidst a host of other macro-economic concerns, besides uncertainty over the upcoming general elections. While the near $3 trillion economy may stay resilient in the face of a limited armed conflict, an escalated conflict may lead to diminished foreign investment and consequent economic slowdown. India is currently jockeying, some would argue not particularly successfully, a limited time-frame during which it can leverage its demographic dividend to transition into a higher-income and productive economy.</div>
<div style="background-color: white; box-sizing: border-box; color: #666666; font-family: "Fira Sans Condensed", sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin-bottom: 20px;">
Further, an armed conflict at this point will also derail the modernisation of the armed forces. The much-needed force modernisation has only recently started to show some form. Indian armed forces are in the process of acquiring as well as developing new platforms and structures to boost defence preparedness. Key amongst these is the restructuring of the Indian Army into a leaner force by creating integrated battle groups. Strides have also been made in creating a separate command for cyber and space warfare. These reforms are critical to the enhancement of the combat capability of the Indian forces. China, too, is undergoing similar reforms, under which its territorial Army has been downsized. An economically and militarily fragile India will not enjoy the same strategic advantages as it currently does, which puts at risk its membership of the Nuclear Suppliers Group and the UN Security Council.</div>
<div style="background-color: white; box-sizing: border-box; color: #666666; font-family: "Fira Sans Condensed", sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin-bottom: 20px;">
The risks of an escalation gone wrong far outweigh any perceived benefits. With the release of the captured IAF pilot, India’s option to escalate has become politically unviable. In this backdrop, non-military escalation would be the most viable strategy.</div>
<div style="background-color: white; box-sizing: border-box; color: #666666; font-family: "Fira Sans Condensed", sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin-bottom: 20px;">
It would be in India’s utmost interest to maintain sustained multi-pronged pressure on Pakistan and ensure that it is declared an international pariah. To begin with, India must rise over the rhetoric and officially treat Pakistan as a terror-sponsoring state in its foreign policy. India’s economic heft and the recent uptick in Indo-China relations post the Wuhan summit, must also be leveraged to score a diplomatic upper hand in its initiatives to blacklist terrorist organisations breeding on Pakistani soil. Non-military punitive actions like weaponising the Indus Water Treaty must be duly considered. Above all, India must carve out a consistent Pakistan policy as the extant mixture of hard and soft approach has far outrun its course.</div>
<div style="background-color: white; box-sizing: border-box; color: #666666; font-family: "Fira Sans Condensed", sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin-bottom: 20px;">
<em style="box-sizing: border-box;">(The writer is legal associate and defence analyst, Koan Advisory Group)</em></div>
</div>
vivan sharanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14813392915753123620noreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1739355480870226467.post-31766197897704236502019-03-28T14:32:00.004+05:302019-03-28T14:32:53.007+05:30Vivan Sharan moderates panel on "Specialisaiton vs. Scale: What work for Indian M&E?" at FICCI FRAMES, March 2019<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<h2 style="border: 0px; box-sizing: border-box; color: #181818; font-family: Merriweather, serif; font-size: 23px; font-stretch: inherit; font-weight: 400; letter-spacing: 0.5px; line-height: 31px; margin: 0px 0px 10px; padding: 0px; text-size-adjust: auto; vertical-align: baseline;">
<!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:OfficeDocumentSettings>
<o:AllowPNG/>
</o:OfficeDocumentSettings>
</xml><![endif]-->
<!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<w:WordDocument>
<w:View>Normal</w:View>
<w:Zoom>0</w:Zoom>
<w:TrackMoves/>
<w:TrackFormatting/>
<w:DoNotShowPropertyChanges/>
<w:PunctuationKerning/>
<w:ValidateAgainstSchemas/>
<w:SaveIfXMLInvalid>false</w:SaveIfXMLInvalid>
<w:IgnoreMixedContent>false</w:IgnoreMixedContent>
<w:AlwaysShowPlaceholderText>false</w:AlwaysShowPlaceholderText>
<w:DoNotPromoteQF/>
<w:LidThemeOther>EN-GB</w:LidThemeOther>
<w:LidThemeAsian>X-NONE</w:LidThemeAsian>
<w:LidThemeComplexScript>X-NONE</w:LidThemeComplexScript>
<w:Compatibility>
<w:BreakWrappedTables/>
<w:SnapToGridInCell/>
<w:WrapTextWithPunct/>
<w:UseAsianBreakRules/>
<w:DontGrowAutofit/>
<w:SplitPgBreakAndParaMark/>
<w:EnableOpenTypeKerning/>
<w:DontFlipMirrorIndents/>
<w:OverrideTableStyleHps/>
</w:Compatibility>
<m:mathPr>
<m:mathFont m:val="Cambria Math"/>
<m:brkBin m:val="before"/>
<m:brkBinSub m:val="--"/>
<m:smallFrac m:val="off"/>
<m:dispDef/>
<m:lMargin m:val="0"/>
<m:rMargin m:val="0"/>
<m:defJc m:val="centerGroup"/>
<m:wrapIndent m:val="1440"/>
<m:intLim m:val="subSup"/>
<m:naryLim m:val="undOvr"/>
</m:mathPr></w:WordDocument>
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<w:LatentStyles DefLockedState="false" DefUnhideWhenUsed="false"
DefSemiHidden="false" DefQFormat="false" DefPriority="99"
LatentStyleCount="375">
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="0" QFormat="true" Name="Normal"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="9" QFormat="true" Name="heading 1"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="9" SemiHidden="true"
UnhideWhenUsed="true" QFormat="true" Name="heading 2"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="9" SemiHidden="true"
UnhideWhenUsed="true" QFormat="true" Name="heading 3"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="9" SemiHidden="true"
UnhideWhenUsed="true" QFormat="true" Name="heading 4"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="9" SemiHidden="true"
UnhideWhenUsed="true" QFormat="true" Name="heading 5"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="9" SemiHidden="true"
UnhideWhenUsed="true" QFormat="true" Name="heading 6"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="9" SemiHidden="true"
UnhideWhenUsed="true" QFormat="true" Name="heading 7"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="9" SemiHidden="true"
UnhideWhenUsed="true" QFormat="true" Name="heading 8"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="9" SemiHidden="true"
UnhideWhenUsed="true" QFormat="true" Name="heading 9"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true"
Name="index 1"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true"
Name="index 2"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true"
Name="index 3"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true"
Name="index 4"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true"
Name="index 5"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true"
Name="index 6"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true"
Name="index 7"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true"
Name="index 8"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true"
Name="index 9"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="39" SemiHidden="true"
UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="toc 1"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="39" SemiHidden="true"
UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="toc 2"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="39" SemiHidden="true"
UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="toc 3"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="39" SemiHidden="true"
UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="toc 4"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="39" SemiHidden="true"
UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="toc 5"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="39" SemiHidden="true"
UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="toc 6"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="39" SemiHidden="true"
UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="toc 7"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="39" SemiHidden="true"
UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="toc 8"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="39" SemiHidden="true"
UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="toc 9"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true"
Name="Normal Indent"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true"
Name="footnote text"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true"
Name="annotation text"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true"
Name="header"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true"
Name="footer"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true"
Name="index heading"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="35" SemiHidden="true"
UnhideWhenUsed="true" QFormat="true" Name="caption"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true"
Name="table of figures"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true"
Name="envelope address"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true"
Name="envelope return"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true"
Name="footnote reference"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true"
Name="annotation reference"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true"
Name="line number"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true"
Name="page number"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true"
Name="endnote reference"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true"
Name="endnote text"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true"
Name="table of authorities"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true"
Name="macro"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true"
Name="toa heading"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true"
Name="List"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true"
Name="List Bullet"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true"
Name="List Number"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true"
Name="List 2"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true"
Name="List 3"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true"
Name="List 4"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true"
Name="List 5"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true"
Name="List Bullet 2"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true"
Name="List Bullet 3"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true"
Name="List Bullet 4"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true"
Name="List Bullet 5"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true"
Name="List Number 2"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true"
Name="List Number 3"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true"
Name="List Number 4"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true"
Name="List Number 5"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="0" QFormat="true" Name="Title"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true"
Name="Closing"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true"
Name="Signature"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="1" SemiHidden="true"
UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="Default Paragraph Font"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true"
Name="Body Text"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true"
Name="Body Text Indent"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true"
Name="List Continue"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true"
Name="List Continue 2"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true"
Name="List Continue 3"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true"
Name="List Continue 4"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true"
Name="List Continue 5"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true"
Name="Message Header"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="11" QFormat="true" Name="Subtitle"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true"
Name="Salutation"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true"
Name="Date"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true"
Name="Body Text First Indent"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true"
Name="Body Text First Indent 2"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true"
Name="Note Heading"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true"
Name="Body Text 2"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true"
Name="Body Text 3"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true"
Name="Body Text Indent 2"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true"
Name="Body Text Indent 3"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true"
Name="Block Text"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true"
Name="Hyperlink"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true"
Name="FollowedHyperlink"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="22" QFormat="true" Name="Strong"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="20" QFormat="true" Name="Emphasis"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true"
Name="Document Map"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true"
Name="Plain Text"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true"
Name="E-mail Signature"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true"
Name="HTML Top of Form"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true"
Name="HTML Bottom of Form"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true"
Name="Normal (Web)"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true"
Name="HTML Acronym"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true"
Name="HTML Address"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true"
Name="HTML Cite"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true"
Name="HTML Code"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true"
Name="HTML Definition"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true"
Name="HTML Keyboard"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true"
Name="HTML Preformatted"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true"
Name="HTML Sample"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true"
Name="HTML Typewriter"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true"
Name="HTML Variable"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true"
Name="Normal Table"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true"
Name="annotation subject"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true"
Name="No List"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true"
Name="Outline List 1"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true"
Name="Outline List 2"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true"
Name="Outline List 3"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true"
Name="Table Simple 1"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true"
Name="Table Simple 2"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true"
Name="Table Simple 3"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true"
Name="Table Classic 1"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true"
Name="Table Classic 2"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true"
Name="Table Classic 3"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true"
Name="Table Classic 4"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true"
Name="Table Colorful 1"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true"
Name="Table Colorful 2"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true"
Name="Table Colorful 3"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true"
Name="Table Columns 1"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true"
Name="Table Columns 2"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true"
Name="Table Columns 3"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true"
Name="Table Columns 4"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true"
Name="Table Columns 5"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true"
Name="Table Grid 1"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true"
Name="Table Grid 2"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true"
Name="Table Grid 3"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true"
Name="Table Grid 4"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true"
Name="Table Grid 5"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true"
Name="Table Grid 6"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true"
Name="Table Grid 7"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true"
Name="Table Grid 8"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true"
Name="Table List 1"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true"
Name="Table List 2"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true"
Name="Table List 3"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true"
Name="Table List 4"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true"
Name="Table List 5"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true"
Name="Table List 6"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true"
Name="Table List 7"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true"
Name="Table List 8"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true"
Name="Table 3D effects 1"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true"
Name="Table 3D effects 2"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true"
Name="Table 3D effects 3"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true"
Name="Table Contemporary"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true"
Name="Table Elegant"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true"
Name="Table Professional"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true"
Name="Table Subtle 1"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true"
Name="Table Subtle 2"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true"
Name="Table Web 1"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true"
Name="Table Web 2"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true"
Name="Table Web 3"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true"
Name="Balloon Text"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="39" Name="Table Grid"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true"
Name="Table Theme"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" Name="Placeholder Text"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="1" QFormat="true" Name="No Spacing"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="60" Name="Light Shading"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="61" Name="Light List"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="62" Name="Light Grid"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="63" Name="Medium Shading 1"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="64" Name="Medium Shading 2"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="65" Name="Medium List 1"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="66" Name="Medium List 2"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="67" Name="Medium Grid 1"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="68" Name="Medium Grid 2"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="69" Name="Medium Grid 3"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="70" Name="Dark List"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="71" Name="Colorful Shading"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="72" Name="Colorful List"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="73" Name="Colorful Grid"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="60" Name="Light Shading Accent 1"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="61" Name="Light List Accent 1"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="62" Name="Light Grid Accent 1"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="63" Name="Medium Shading 1 Accent 1"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="64" Name="Medium Shading 2 Accent 1"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="65" Name="Medium List 1 Accent 1"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" Name="Revision"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="34" QFormat="true"
Name="List Paragraph"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="29" QFormat="true" Name="Quote"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="30" QFormat="true"
Name="Intense Quote"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="66" Name="Medium List 2 Accent 1"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="67" Name="Medium Grid 1 Accent 1"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="68" Name="Medium Grid 2 Accent 1"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="69" Name="Medium Grid 3 Accent 1"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="70" Name="Dark List Accent 1"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="71" Name="Colorful Shading Accent 1"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="72" Name="Colorful List Accent 1"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="73" Name="Colorful Grid Accent 1"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="60" Name="Light Shading Accent 2"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="61" Name="Light List Accent 2"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="62" Name="Light Grid Accent 2"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="63" Name="Medium Shading 1 Accent 2"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="64" Name="Medium Shading 2 Accent 2"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="65" Name="Medium List 1 Accent 2"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="66" Name="Medium List 2 Accent 2"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="67" Name="Medium Grid 1 Accent 2"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="68" Name="Medium Grid 2 Accent 2"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="69" Name="Medium Grid 3 Accent 2"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="70" Name="Dark List Accent 2"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="71" Name="Colorful Shading Accent 2"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="72" Name="Colorful List Accent 2"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="73" Name="Colorful Grid Accent 2"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="60" Name="Light Shading Accent 3"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="61" Name="Light List Accent 3"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="62" Name="Light Grid Accent 3"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="63" Name="Medium Shading 1 Accent 3"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="64" Name="Medium Shading 2 Accent 3"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="65" Name="Medium List 1 Accent 3"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="66" Name="Medium List 2 Accent 3"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="67" Name="Medium Grid 1 Accent 3"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="68" Name="Medium Grid 2 Accent 3"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="69" Name="Medium Grid 3 Accent 3"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="70" Name="Dark List Accent 3"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="71" Name="Colorful Shading Accent 3"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="72" Name="Colorful List Accent 3"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="73" Name="Colorful Grid Accent 3"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="60" Name="Light Shading Accent 4"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="61" Name="Light List Accent 4"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="62" Name="Light Grid Accent 4"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="63" Name="Medium Shading 1 Accent 4"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="64" Name="Medium Shading 2 Accent 4"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="65" Name="Medium List 1 Accent 4"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="66" Name="Medium List 2 Accent 4"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="67" Name="Medium Grid 1 Accent 4"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="68" Name="Medium Grid 2 Accent 4"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="69" Name="Medium Grid 3 Accent 4"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="70" Name="Dark List Accent 4"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="71" Name="Colorful Shading Accent 4"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="72" Name="Colorful List Accent 4"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="73" Name="Colorful Grid Accent 4"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="60" Name="Light Shading Accent 5"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="61" Name="Light List Accent 5"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="62" Name="Light Grid Accent 5"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="63" Name="Medium Shading 1 Accent 5"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="64" Name="Medium Shading 2 Accent 5"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="65" Name="Medium List 1 Accent 5"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="66" Name="Medium List 2 Accent 5"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="67" Name="Medium Grid 1 Accent 5"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="68" Name="Medium Grid 2 Accent 5"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="69" Name="Medium Grid 3 Accent 5"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="70" Name="Dark List Accent 5"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="71" Name="Colorful Shading Accent 5"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="72" Name="Colorful List Accent 5"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="73" Name="Colorful Grid Accent 5"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="60" Name="Light Shading Accent 6"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="61" Name="Light List Accent 6"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="62" Name="Light Grid Accent 6"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="63" Name="Medium Shading 1 Accent 6"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="64" Name="Medium Shading 2 Accent 6"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="65" Name="Medium List 1 Accent 6"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="66" Name="Medium List 2 Accent 6"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="67" Name="Medium Grid 1 Accent 6"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="68" Name="Medium Grid 2 Accent 6"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="69" Name="Medium Grid 3 Accent 6"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="70" Name="Dark List Accent 6"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="71" Name="Colorful Shading Accent 6"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="72" Name="Colorful List Accent 6"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="73" Name="Colorful Grid Accent 6"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="19" QFormat="true"
Name="Subtle Emphasis"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="21" QFormat="true"
Name="Intense Emphasis"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="31" QFormat="true"
Name="Subtle Reference"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="32" QFormat="true"
Name="Intense Reference"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="33" QFormat="true" Name="Book Title"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="37" SemiHidden="true"
UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="Bibliography"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="39" SemiHidden="true"
UnhideWhenUsed="true" QFormat="true" Name="TOC Heading"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="41" Name="Plain Table 1"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="42" Name="Plain Table 2"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="43" Name="Plain Table 3"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="44" Name="Plain Table 4"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="45" Name="Plain Table 5"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="40" Name="Grid Table Light"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="46" Name="Grid Table 1 Light"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="47" Name="Grid Table 2"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="48" Name="Grid Table 3"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="49" Name="Grid Table 4"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="50" Name="Grid Table 5 Dark"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="51" Name="Grid Table 6 Colorful"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="52" Name="Grid Table 7 Colorful"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="46"
Name="Grid Table 1 Light Accent 1"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="47" Name="Grid Table 2 Accent 1"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="48" Name="Grid Table 3 Accent 1"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="49" Name="Grid Table 4 Accent 1"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="50" Name="Grid Table 5 Dark Accent 1"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="51"
Name="Grid Table 6 Colorful Accent 1"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="52"
Name="Grid Table 7 Colorful Accent 1"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="46"
Name="Grid Table 1 Light Accent 2"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="47" Name="Grid Table 2 Accent 2"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="48" Name="Grid Table 3 Accent 2"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="49" Name="Grid Table 4 Accent 2"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="50" Name="Grid Table 5 Dark Accent 2"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="51"
Name="Grid Table 6 Colorful Accent 2"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="52"
Name="Grid Table 7 Colorful Accent 2"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="46"
Name="Grid Table 1 Light Accent 3"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="47" Name="Grid Table 2 Accent 3"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="48" Name="Grid Table 3 Accent 3"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="49" Name="Grid Table 4 Accent 3"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="50" Name="Grid Table 5 Dark Accent 3"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="51"
Name="Grid Table 6 Colorful Accent 3"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="52"
Name="Grid Table 7 Colorful Accent 3"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="46"
Name="Grid Table 1 Light Accent 4"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="47" Name="Grid Table 2 Accent 4"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="48" Name="Grid Table 3 Accent 4"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="49" Name="Grid Table 4 Accent 4"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="50" Name="Grid Table 5 Dark Accent 4"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="51"
Name="Grid Table 6 Colorful Accent 4"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="52"
Name="Grid Table 7 Colorful Accent 4"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="46"
Name="Grid Table 1 Light Accent 5"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="47" Name="Grid Table 2 Accent 5"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="48" Name="Grid Table 3 Accent 5"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="49" Name="Grid Table 4 Accent 5"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="50" Name="Grid Table 5 Dark Accent 5"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="51"
Name="Grid Table 6 Colorful Accent 5"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="52"
Name="Grid Table 7 Colorful Accent 5"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="46"
Name="Grid Table 1 Light Accent 6"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="47" Name="Grid Table 2 Accent 6"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="48" Name="Grid Table 3 Accent 6"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="49" Name="Grid Table 4 Accent 6"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="50" Name="Grid Table 5 Dark Accent 6"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="51"
Name="Grid Table 6 Colorful Accent 6"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="52"
Name="Grid Table 7 Colorful Accent 6"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="46" Name="List Table 1 Light"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="47" Name="List Table 2"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="48" Name="List Table 3"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="49" Name="List Table 4"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="50" Name="List Table 5 Dark"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="51" Name="List Table 6 Colorful"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="52" Name="List Table 7 Colorful"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="46"
Name="List Table 1 Light Accent 1"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="47" Name="List Table 2 Accent 1"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="48" Name="List Table 3 Accent 1"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="49" Name="List Table 4 Accent 1"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="50" Name="List Table 5 Dark Accent 1"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="51"
Name="List Table 6 Colorful Accent 1"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="52"
Name="List Table 7 Colorful Accent 1"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="46"
Name="List Table 1 Light Accent 2"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="47" Name="List Table 2 Accent 2"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="48" Name="List Table 3 Accent 2"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="49" Name="List Table 4 Accent 2"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="50" Name="List Table 5 Dark Accent 2"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="51"
Name="List Table 6 Colorful Accent 2"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="52"
Name="List Table 7 Colorful Accent 2"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="46"
Name="List Table 1 Light Accent 3"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="47" Name="List Table 2 Accent 3"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="48" Name="List Table 3 Accent 3"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="49" Name="List Table 4 Accent 3"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="50" Name="List Table 5 Dark Accent 3"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="51"
Name="List Table 6 Colorful Accent 3"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="52"
Name="List Table 7 Colorful Accent 3"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="46"
Name="List Table 1 Light Accent 4"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="47" Name="List Table 2 Accent 4"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="48" Name="List Table 3 Accent 4"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="49" Name="List Table 4 Accent 4"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="50" Name="List Table 5 Dark Accent 4"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="51"
Name="List Table 6 Colorful Accent 4"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="52"
Name="List Table 7 Colorful Accent 4"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="46"
Name="List Table 1 Light Accent 5"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="47" Name="List Table 2 Accent 5"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="48" Name="List Table 3 Accent 5"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="49" Name="List Table 4 Accent 5"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="50" Name="List Table 5 Dark Accent 5"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="51"
Name="List Table 6 Colorful Accent 5"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="52"
Name="List Table 7 Colorful Accent 5"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="46"
Name="List Table 1 Light Accent 6"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="47" Name="List Table 2 Accent 6"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="48" Name="List Table 3 Accent 6"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="49" Name="List Table 4 Accent 6"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="50" Name="List Table 5 Dark Accent 6"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="51"
Name="List Table 6 Colorful Accent 6"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="52"
Name="List Table 7 Colorful Accent 6"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true"
Name="Mention"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true"
Name="Smart Hyperlink"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true"
Name="Hashtag"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true"
Name="Unresolved Mention"/>
</w:LatentStyles>
</xml><![endif]-->
<style>
<!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:"Cambria Math";
panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;
mso-font-charset:0;
mso-generic-font-family:roman;
mso-font-pitch:variable;
mso-font-signature:-536870145 1107305727 0 0 415 0;}
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;
mso-font-charset:0;
mso-generic-font-family:swiss;
mso-font-pitch:variable;
mso-font-signature:-536859905 -1073732485 9 0 511 0;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{mso-style-unhide:no;
mso-style-qformat:yes;
mso-style-parent:"";
margin:0cm;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
mso-pagination:widow-orphan;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman",serif;
mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman";}
span.apple-converted-space
{mso-style-name:apple-converted-space;
mso-style-unhide:no;}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;
mso-default-props:yes;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;
mso-ascii-font-family:Calibri;
mso-ascii-theme-font:minor-latin;
mso-fareast-font-family:Calibri;
mso-fareast-theme-font:minor-latin;
mso-hansi-font-family:Calibri;
mso-hansi-theme-font:minor-latin;
mso-bidi-font-family:"Times New Roman";
mso-bidi-theme-font:minor-bidi;
mso-ansi-language:EN-GB;
mso-fareast-language:EN-US;}
@page WordSection1
{size:595.0pt 842.0pt;
margin:72.0pt 72.0pt 72.0pt 72.0pt;
mso-header-margin:35.4pt;
mso-footer-margin:35.4pt;
mso-paper-source:0;}
div.WordSection1
{page:WordSection1;}
-->
</style>
<!--[if gte mso 10]>
<style>
/* Style Definitions */
table.MsoNormalTable
{mso-style-name:"Table Normal";
mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0;
mso-tstyle-colband-size:0;
mso-style-noshow:yes;
mso-style-priority:99;
mso-style-parent:"";
mso-padding-alt:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;
mso-para-margin:0cm;
mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt;
mso-pagination:widow-orphan;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;
mso-ascii-font-family:Calibri;
mso-ascii-theme-font:minor-latin;
mso-hansi-font-family:Calibri;
mso-hansi-theme-font:minor-latin;
mso-bidi-font-family:"Times New Roman";
mso-bidi-theme-font:minor-bidi;
mso-ansi-language:EN-GB;
mso-fareast-language:EN-US;}
</style>
<![endif]-->
<!--StartFragment-->
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span lang="EN-US"> </span><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Specialisation
vs. Scale: What works for Indian M&E?</span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span lang="EN-US">The Indian
M&E space is in the throes of transition. Production processes are becoming
increasingly specialized as a result of technological changes and fragmentation
of global supply chains. Simultaneously, convergence and consolidation are
driving the need for creative businesses to achieve scale, to reach more
consumers and remain export-competitive in global markets. The panel will
debate how stakeholders in the Indian creative economy, including within civil
society and government, should balance these imperatives. <o:p></o:p></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<b><span lang="EN-US">Moderator<o:p></o:p></span></b></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<b><span style="color: black; font-family: "Calibri",sans-serif; mso-bidi-font-family: "Times New Roman";">Vivan Sharan, </span></b><span style="color: black; font-family: "Calibri",sans-serif; mso-bidi-font-family: "Times New Roman"; mso-bidi-font-weight: bold;">Partner, Koan Advisory Group<o:p></o:p></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<b><span style="color: black; font-family: "Calibri",sans-serif; mso-bidi-font-family: "Times New Roman";">Panellists</span></b></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<b><span style="color: black; font-family: "Calibri",sans-serif; mso-bidi-font-family: "Times New Roman";">Arun Thapar,<span class="apple-converted-space"> </span></span></b><span style="color: black; font-family: "Calibri",sans-serif; mso-bidi-font-family: "Times New Roman";">Head of Content, A+E Networks<o:p></o:p></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<b><span style="color: black; font-family: "Calibri",sans-serif; mso-bidi-font-family: "Times New Roman";">Shohini Sengupta,<span class="apple-converted-space"> </span></span></b><span style="color: black; font-family: "Calibri",sans-serif; mso-bidi-font-family: "Times New Roman";">Fellow,
Esya Centre<o:p></o:p></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<b><span lang="EN-US">Shreyas Srinivasan, </span></b><span lang="EN-US">Founder and CEO, Insider.in<b><o:p></o:p></b></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<b><span lang="EN-US">Dinraj Shetty, </span></b><span lang="EN-US">Director, Digital Sales, licensing and Business
Development, Sony Music Entertainment<o:p></o:p></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<b><span lang="EN-US">Karan Ahluwalia,</span></b><span lang="EN-US"> Senior President and Country Head, M&E,
Fine Arts, Luxury and Sports Banking Group, Yes Bank<b><o:p></o:p></b></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<!--EndFragment--></h2>
Coverage link:<br />
<a href="https://bestmediainfo.com/2019/03/experts-debate-what-is-stopping-indian-creative-economy-from-growing/">https://bestmediainfo.com/2019/03/experts-debate-what-is-stopping-indian-creative-economy-from-growing/</a></div>
vivan sharanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14813392915753123620noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1739355480870226467.post-82674784647878203612019-03-28T14:27:00.000+05:302019-03-28T14:27:42.022+05:30Kaon Advisory's coverage of FICCI FRAMES, March 2019<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
Koan Advisory experts blog about various sessions held at FICCI FRAMES 2019, for the Motion Pictures Association.<br />
<br />
The blogs can be found at this link:<br />
<br />
<a href="https://www.creativefirst.film/articles/creative-first-s-coverage-of-ficci-frames-20">https://www.creativefirst.film/articles/creative-first-s-coverage-of-ficci-frames-20</a><br />
<br />
<br /></div>
vivan sharanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14813392915753123620noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1739355480870226467.post-12586450759081368672019-03-28T14:18:00.000+05:302019-03-28T14:18:01.178+05:30Koan Advisory's response to public consultation on amendment to Cinematograph Bill <div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
The submission can be found here:<br />
<a href="https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B8kzRsT_z4q8QTBIcVIyYW1mMlZsNDFyRmtaQmtOUl9zQVdB/view?usp=sharing">https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B8kzRsT_z4q8QTBIcVIyYW1mMlZsNDFyRmtaQmtOUl9zQVdB/view?usp=sharing</a></div>
vivan sharanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14813392915753123620noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1739355480870226467.post-47607792916448002142019-03-28T14:16:00.000+05:302019-03-28T14:16:07.922+05:30Uncertain steps towards an E-commerce policy, Co-authored by Vivan Sharan, 10 March 2019<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
Original Link<div>
<a href="https://www.financialexpress.com/industry/draft-e-commerce-policy-india-2019-intellectual-property/1511025/?fbclid=IwAR2aixO37x_boB5CzEfpIoj9BMxYFCso1YtSN_Dd4b88uMfovL147cQ-8b0">https://www.financialexpress.com/industry/draft-e-commerce-policy-india-2019-intellectual-property/1511025/?fbclid=IwAR2aixO37x_boB5CzEfpIoj9BMxYFCso1YtSN_Dd4b88uMfovL147cQ-8b0</a></div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
<div style="border: 0px; box-sizing: border-box; caret-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: Montserrat, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; letter-spacing: -0.4px; line-height: 28px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px 0px 20px; text-size-adjust: auto; vertical-align: baseline;">
India recently unveiled a second draft of its ‘E-commerce Policy’, for feedback from the public. Although one may laud the attempt to put a long-term lens on complex and uncharted technology-market issues through such a policy, the draft fails at locating the drivers of innovation and value generation within the digital space. Specifically, it draws a direct correlation between access to data and the rate of innovation and success in the digital economy. However, while data is valuable, it is not the foundational catalyst for digital innovation.</div>
<div style="border: 0px; box-sizing: border-box; caret-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: Montserrat, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; letter-spacing: -0.4px; line-height: 28px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px 0px 20px; text-size-adjust: auto; vertical-align: baseline;">
Rather, innovation stems from the provision of incentives – a fundamental premise of the many intellectual property (IP) frameworks that safeguard the value generated by innovation the world over. IP rights are granted to innovators for their creations, allowing them to commercialise their work without fear of misappropriation. Illustratively, Section 2(o) of the Indian Copyright Act, 1957 deems computer compilations, tables and databases as ‘literary works’, thereby rendering them eligible for IP protection, and therefore, creating incentives for their generation. The broader point is, data in and of itself is not necessarily useful. It’s the way in which data is harnessed or curated for commercial use or public services, that determines its true value.</div>
<div style="border: 0px; box-sizing: border-box; caret-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: Montserrat, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; letter-spacing: -0.4px; line-height: 28px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px 0px 20px; text-size-adjust: auto; vertical-align: baseline;">
If the state removes incentives to generating value from data, by labelling itself the self-declared ‘trustee’ of all data generated domestically, which seems to be a central premise of the draft policy, it does not offer any service to the growth of<span class="Apple-converted-space"> </span><a href="http://www.financialexpress.com/tag/digital-india/" style="box-sizing: border-box; color: #00599b; margin: 0px; outline: none; padding: 0px; text-decoration-line: none; vertical-align: baseline;" target="_blank">digital India</a>. Consider for instance, if Indian start-ups were forced to share proprietary datasets and source-codes with larger domestic competitors under the guise of unfettered access. What incentive would a small business have to get involved in a data-driven business? Is such expropriation completely out of question in our uncertain political economy? What safeguards have been put in place for any business to survive similar future state-interventions?</div>
<div style="border: 0px; box-sizing: border-box; caret-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: Montserrat, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; letter-spacing: -0.4px; line-height: 28px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px 0px 20px; text-size-adjust: auto; vertical-align: baseline;">
Additionally, let’s invert the prism to question why small businesses in India have to struggle to get their hands on public data that should already be universally accessible. Is it not the state’s responsibility to first and foremost unfetter local innovation by sharing non-sensitive public data? Consider the case of the Open Government Data portal. Launched in 2012, the portal was meant to serve as a comprehensive and universally accessible repository of public data sets. However, a majority of such data sets are either missing, incomplete, or outdated. As the largest repository of individual and community data, the state has the greatest responsibility to share data openly. Yet, it retains its monopoly over public data and simultaneously threatens to throttle value generation by creating an over broad interpretation of ‘open data’ to include almost any data in the commercial domain.</div>
<div style="border: 0px; box-sizing: border-box; caret-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: Montserrat, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; letter-spacing: -0.4px; line-height: 28px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px 0px 20px; text-size-adjust: auto; vertical-align: baseline;">
Lastly, even though this policy document is chiefly aimed at addressing domestic policy questions, it lacks vision in terms of how Indian businesses will generate value from delivery of digital products to international markets. Ironically, the drafting of the policy was triggered due to growing pressures to negotiate on e-commerce issues at the World Trade Organisation, and the absence of a negotiating position, were India to enter such discussions. It is striking, then, how international market-access is not even a passing concern within the draft policy, despite the fact that the logic of entering into any future multilateral discussions would be to negotiate better access for Indian businesses.</div>
<div style="border: 0px; box-sizing: border-box; caret-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: Montserrat, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; letter-spacing: -0.4px; line-height: 28px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px 0px 20px; text-size-adjust: auto; vertical-align: baseline;">
If access to international markets was of real concern, the draft policy would not delve into areas that leave India vulnerable to reciprocal denial of access. For example, if India were to impose economic protections in the form of customs duties on inbound digital products, as the draft policy intends to do, it will surely suffer disadvantages as trade partners will impose reciprocal duties on outbound Indian products headed to their markets. An emphatic instance of this is the recent trade fracas between the US and China. In 2018, the US imposed 25 percent tariffs on USD 16 billion worth of Chinese goods. China, in turn, hit back immediately with a tariff on an equivalent amount of goods from the US.</div>
<div style="border: 0px; box-sizing: border-box; caret-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: Montserrat, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; letter-spacing: -0.4px; line-height: 28px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px 0px 20px; text-size-adjust: auto; vertical-align: baseline;">
India is considering nipping its own international market-access in the bud at a time when it has not lost a theoretical comparative advantage to advanced countries in digital products. Illustratively, a third of the population is actively engaging with the internet, making domestic markets an excellent proving ground for new digital products ranging from video games to e-books. Moreover, India has immense human capital and a knack for low-cost innovation in digital industries – where the overall lack of physical infrastructure is not always a binding constraint like it is in manufacturing.</div>
<div style="border: 0px; box-sizing: border-box; caret-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: Montserrat, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; letter-spacing: -0.4px; line-height: 28px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px 0px 20px; text-size-adjust: auto; vertical-align: baseline;">
Conversely, if policymakers think that India is already so behind the innovation curve in digital markets, that the country needs economic protections that are exceptional in a global context, they cannot simultaneously claim that ‘Digital India’ is an unqualified success. We cannot have our cake and eat it too.</div>
<div style="border: 0px; box-sizing: border-box; caret-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: Montserrat, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; letter-spacing: -0.4px; line-height: 28px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px 0px 20px; text-size-adjust: auto; vertical-align: baseline;">
<em style="border: 0px; box-sizing: border-box; margin: 0px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">-The authors are technology policy experts based in New Delhi. These are their personal views. </em></div>
</div>
</div>
vivan sharanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14813392915753123620noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1739355480870226467.post-85040983484286762862019-03-28T14:13:00.000+05:302019-03-28T14:13:21.433+05:30Koan Advisory's response to public consultation on Amendment to the Sports Broadcasting Signals Act, January 2019<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
View the submission here:<br />
<a href="https://drive.google.com/file/d/1zZHRALDfGRDRpJDC1S3I506fsas2uR9q/view?usp=sharing">https://drive.google.com/file/d/1zZHRALDfGRDRpJDC1S3I506fsas2uR9q/view?usp=sharing</a></div>
vivan sharanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14813392915753123620noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1739355480870226467.post-43824700822104211252019-03-28T14:11:00.001+05:302019-03-28T14:11:28.238+05:30 Twitter furore shows need to empower local executives, Vivan Sharan and Trishi Jindal, Mint, 12 February 2019<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<div style="backface-visibility: hidden; color: #212121; font-family: "PT Serif Regular", serif; font-size: 18px; line-height: 28px; list-style-type: none; outline: none; overflow-wrap: break-word; padding: 8px 20px; text-size-adjust: auto;">
Original link: <a href="https://www.livemint.com/opinion/online-views/opinion-twitter-furore-shows-need-to-empower-local-executives-1549991606777.html" target="_blank">https://www.livemint.com/opinion/online-views/opinion-twitter-furore-shows-need-to-empower-local-executives-1549991606777.html</a></div>
<div style="backface-visibility: hidden; color: #212121; font-family: "PT Serif Regular", serif; font-size: 18px; line-height: 28px; list-style-type: none; outline: none; overflow-wrap: break-word; padding: 8px 20px; text-size-adjust: auto;">
The quicker technology companies operating in India realize the merits of empowering their local executives, the faster the Indian digital economy will come of age. Technology regularly outpaces regulation globally, necessitating nuanced debates between industry and government in every major jurisdiction, and therefore, decision-making agility on both sides. Additionally, India has a complex digital culture that doesn’t easily lend itself to quick fixes by government or industry. This is evident in the case of ongoing discussions on regulating social media platforms that are marred by the lack of a solutions-oriented approach on either side.</div>
<div style="backface-visibility: hidden; color: #212121; font-family: "PT Serif Regular", serif; font-size: 18px; line-height: 28px; list-style-type: none; outline: none; overflow-wrap: break-word; padding: 8px 20px; text-size-adjust: auto;">
India’s Standing Committee on Information Technology recently summoned Twitter to testify before it on matters relating to “safeguarding citizen’s rights on social media platforms". This ostensibly followed from a protest lodged with the committee on selective censorship of political views online. Though some local Twitter officials did appear before the committee this week, the company had initially sought a deferment citing short notice and reportedly submitted that “no one who engages publicly for Twitter India makes enforcement decisions". If reports are true, the submission is a rare and candid admission that local executives are not empowered to negotiate their own interests.</div>
<div style="backface-visibility: hidden; color: #212121; font-family: "PT Serif Regular", serif; font-size: 18px; line-height: 28px; list-style-type: none; outline: none; overflow-wrap: break-word; padding: 8px 20px; text-size-adjust: auto;">
In the past, policymakers were predominantly concerned with providing access to the internet, which led to many debates on privatization of information infrastructure. Good sense prevailed in letting private sector investments flourish, precipitating a virtuous cycle of greater connectivity and consumer access. While India still has millions of “digital have-nots"—individuals who remain unconnected—it also has a substantial infrastructural backbone with close to half a billion broadband users expected to come online before 2020.</div>
<div style="backface-visibility: hidden; color: #212121; font-family: "PT Serif Regular", serif; font-size: 18px; line-height: 28px; list-style-type: none; outline: none; overflow-wrap: break-word; padding: 8px 20px; text-size-adjust: auto;">
<span style="background-color: white; caret-color: rgb(33, 33, 33); text-size-adjust: auto;">A corollary of exponentially greater consumer access to the internet is that policymakers must now contend with much more complexity in digital markets, a reality that industry executives must also empathise with. Moreover, the government’s under-preparedness to manage new challenges at the intersection of technology and society may prompt overregulation of new markets. Where the internet was meant to liberate society as a force removed from it, it now appears closer to a manifestation of many of the ills of society, such as hate speech and violent extremism, phenomena that are particularly concentrated on social media. While curtailing online speech would be antithetical to democratic values, global companies must recognize local context. Online speech is largely unregulated in advanced jurisdictions because of better state-capacity to deal with negative outcomes offline.</span></div>
<div style="backface-visibility: hidden; color: #212121; font-family: "PT Serif Regular", serif; font-size: 18px; line-height: 28px; list-style-type: none; outline: none; overflow-wrap: break-word; padding: 8px 20px; text-size-adjust: auto;">
Tech scholars like Daphne Keller have characterized internet policies today as fighting poorly defined harms with remedies that remain untested. Indian policymakers have been unable to pinpoint the nature and quantum of harms caused through social media platforms. To wit, there is no official report on the mechanics of lynch mobs—how are they triggered, how online misinformation campaigns are funded, or even what role political actors play, if any. Equally, adequate remedies such as the balancing of stricter enforcement with institutional and legal safeguards for protecting free speech and expression are rarely discussed within government.</div>
<div style="backface-visibility: hidden; color: #212121; font-family: "PT Serif Regular", serif; font-size: 18px; line-height: 28px; list-style-type: none; outline: none; overflow-wrap: break-word; padding: 8px 20px; text-size-adjust: auto;">
<span style="background-color: white; caret-color: rgb(33, 33, 33); text-size-adjust: auto;"></span></div>
<div style="backface-visibility: hidden; color: #212121; font-family: "PT Serif Regular", serif; font-size: 18px; line-height: 28px; list-style-type: none; outline: none; overflow-wrap: break-word; padding: 8px 20px; text-size-adjust: auto;">
Protectionism adds another dimension to the mix of new digital policy questions that are only just being addressed. Recent debates on e-commerce policies, data protection laws, and regulation of online intermediaries, characterize this dimension. How do we protect interests of domestic companies without being brazenly discriminatory? Should we look at global standards to mould domestic templates for internet governance? Or should we forge our own prescriptive and exceptional regulatory norms in isolation?</div>
<div style="backface-visibility: hidden; color: #212121; font-family: "PT Serif Regular", serif; font-size: 18px; line-height: 28px; list-style-type: none; outline: none; overflow-wrap: break-word; padding: 8px 20px; text-size-adjust: auto;">
Local executives of global companies can play an important role in resolving such questions from their informed vantage points. They have line of sight on the dynamic landscape of global markets. Simultaneously, they are well-placed to leverage global exposure to the cutting-edge of internet governance. Instead, most such executives are compelled to take conservative positions in India and resist any hint of enhanced government interface, even as their global counterparts engage in serious debates in the US and EU. Consequently, the Indian state acts in its limited self-interest by overregulating what it feels it can’t control.</div>
<div style="backface-visibility: hidden; color: #212121; font-family: "PT Serif Regular", serif; font-size: 18px; line-height: 28px; list-style-type: none; outline: none; overflow-wrap: break-word; padding: 8px 20px; text-size-adjust: auto;">
Equally, it is about time that the state recognizes that not all solutions can come from within. Some global companies have shown the ability to propose and implement practical solutions to local challenges. For instance, government-industry dialogue has led to the adoption of a Code of Best Practices by nine large online curated content firms this January. The code redoubles industry commitment to protecting kids from accessing adult content. Transparent self-regulation can protect free speech and promote plurality of opinions, whereas prescriptive government regulation almost always leads to excessive censorship. Proactive standard-setting must be welcomed as a first wave of corporate enlightenment in digital India, a wave that can truly lift all boats by securing values shared by policymakers, industry and citizens.</div>
<div style="backface-visibility: hidden; color: #212121; font-family: "PT Serif Regular", serif; font-size: 18px; line-height: 28px; list-style-type: none; outline: none; overflow-wrap: break-word; padding: 8px 20px; text-size-adjust: auto;">
<em style="backface-visibility: hidden; caret-color: rgb(33, 33, 33); list-style-type: none; margin: 0px; outline: none; overflow-wrap: break-word; padding: 0px; text-size-adjust: auto;">Vivan Sharan & Trishi Jindal are technology policy experts at Koan Advisory Group, New Delhi. Views are personal.</em></div>
</div>
vivan sharanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14813392915753123620noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1739355480870226467.post-18627536502721440662019-03-28T14:05:00.001+05:302019-03-28T14:05:16.577+05:30How to realize value from digital markets in 2019, Vivan Sharan, Mint, 14 January 2019<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<div style="backface-visibility: hidden; color: #212121; font-family: "PT Serif Regular", serif; font-size: 18px; line-height: 28px; list-style-type: none; outline: none; overflow-wrap: break-word; padding: 8px 20px; text-size-adjust: auto;" xmlns:fn="">
Original Link:</div>
<div style="backface-visibility: hidden; color: #212121; font-family: "PT Serif Regular", serif; font-size: 18px; line-height: 28px; list-style-type: none; outline: none; overflow-wrap: break-word; padding: 8px 20px; text-size-adjust: auto;" xmlns:fn="">
<a href="https://www.livemint.com/Opinion/d1OLxrRY4ysJhu0vVGtZ2L/Opinion--How-to-realize-value-from-digital-markets-in-2019.html?fbclid=IwAR1iJ9TOuum2SVnBLY8xCNfSc4idON4j7An1-R1lDuLXYZMCQKYMt2B7zb0">https://www.livemint.com/Opinion/d1OLxrRY4ysJhu0vVGtZ2L/Opinion--How-to-realize-value-from-digital-markets-in-2019.html?fbclid=IwAR1iJ9TOuum2SVnBLY8xCNfSc4idON4j7An1-R1lDuLXYZMCQKYMt2B7zb0</a></div>
<div style="backface-visibility: hidden; color: #212121; font-family: "PT Serif Regular", serif; font-size: 18px; line-height: 28px; list-style-type: none; outline: none; overflow-wrap: break-word; padding: 8px 20px; text-size-adjust: auto;" xmlns:fn="">
Digitalization has rapidly altered the contours of the Indian economy, especially in terms of improved consumer access to goods and services. Tens of millions of new participants have been added to digital markets through the expansion of telecom and internet services in 2018. In the midst of this feverish activity, confusion persists over what constitutes a definitive and durable vision for a digital India—exemplified by debates on why Indian companies struggle to generate value within domestic digital markets.<span class="Apple-converted-space"> </span></div>
<div style="backface-visibility: hidden; color: #212121; font-family: "PT Serif Regular", serif; font-size: 18px; line-height: 28px; list-style-type: none; outline: none; overflow-wrap: break-word; padding: 8px 20px; text-size-adjust: auto;">
China has about 15 times as many unicorns—billion-dollar startups—as India does, despite the fact that the Chinese economy is 2.5 times that of India’s in terms of gross domestic product (GDP) adjusted to purchasing power parity. Such asymmetry of outcomes reflects in global comparisons too. India has some of the lowest average revenues per user in telecom markets despite some of the highest data consumption volumes in the world, and a tiny subscription market for digital products such as audiovisual services, which is dwarfed by small countries such as Singapore.</div>
<div style="backface-visibility: hidden; color: #212121; font-family: "PT Serif Regular", serif; font-size: 18px; line-height: 28px; list-style-type: none; outline: none; overflow-wrap: break-word; padding: 8px 20px; text-size-adjust: auto;">
Value creation tends to involve innovation in the production of goods and services that people are willing to pay for. Naturally, intellectual property must lie at the heart of this process, finely balanced alongside consumer access. However, a form of “digital socialism" seems to have manifested itself in India’s digital economy discourse as a panacea for the lack of value. This school of thought seems to emphasize a large role for state intervention in redistributing the value created in digital markets, which largely resides in data.<span class="Apple-converted-space"> </span></div>
<div style="backface-visibility: hidden; color: #212121; font-family: "PT Serif Regular", serif; font-size: 18px; line-height: 28px; list-style-type: none; outline: none; overflow-wrap: break-word; padding: 8px 20px; text-size-adjust: auto;">
The desire for state intervention is most visible in regulatory consultations on areas such as data protection and licensing of online applications, parts of which focus on treating all data as a public good. Ongoing discussions lack nuance in differentiating between the implications of unrestricted access to government data and private data. China is naturally a source of inspiration for those who evangelise the benefits of state-intervention to actualise what is essentially an over-broad interpretation of the notion of “open data".</div>
<div style="backface-visibility: hidden; color: #212121; font-family: "PT Serif Regular", serif; font-size: 18px; line-height: 28px; list-style-type: none; outline: none; overflow-wrap: break-word; padding: 8px 20px; text-size-adjust: auto;">
Admittedly, China’s micromanaged market growth has been nothing short of astonishing. The country accounted for just under 4% of world GDP in 1991 and now accounts for 15%. Mandating data-sharing is not dissimilar to mandated joint ventures in China’s industrial ecosystem. However, both dilute incentives to innovation and lower chances of safeguarding privately held intellectual property. It is important to recall that China appropriated space in the global economy from emerging markets such as India. Conversely, countries with a strong culture for innovation and monetization of intellectual property such as the US have held on to their share. The US has consistently accounted for around 25% of global GDP despite China’s swift rise over the last three decades.<span class="Apple-converted-space"> </span></div>
<div style="backface-visibility: hidden; color: #212121; font-family: "PT Serif Regular", serif; font-size: 18px; line-height: 28px; list-style-type: none; outline: none; overflow-wrap: break-word; padding: 8px 20px; text-size-adjust: auto;">
It is likely that if India lowers its focus on incentivizing and safeguarding innovation in favour of creating an unqualified and unfettered open data ecosystem, China will be its biggest beneficiary.</div>
<div style="backface-visibility: hidden; color: #212121; font-family: "PT Serif Regular", serif; font-size: 18px; line-height: 28px; list-style-type: none; outline: none; overflow-wrap: break-word; padding: 8px 20px; text-size-adjust: auto;">
Chinese firms are already dominating India’s digital markets, from devices to online applications. And the modus operandi of China’s digital giants strongly resembles that of its manufacturing giants. China’s industry majors are offloading their excess capacity in India and focusing on extracting incremental value. For instance, Chinese smartphone brands account for a two-third market share in India—and seem to be the biggest beneficiaries of India’s aspirational consumption. Similarly, the imposition of digital socialism will not deter China’s cash-rich online giants from extracting value from India’s digital markets— consonant with its expansionist Belt and Road Initiative.<span class="Apple-converted-space"> </span></div>
<div style="backface-visibility: hidden; color: #212121; font-family: "PT Serif Regular", serif; font-size: 18px; line-height: 28px; list-style-type: none; outline: none; overflow-wrap: break-word; padding: 8px 20px; text-size-adjust: auto;">
The fact is that Chinese businesses will willingly acquiesce in over-regulation in return for a captive market. They have had more than a practice run at embracing the notion of state-controlled digital economy. So, how should India prevent Chinese colonisation of its digital markets, and build focus on creating competitive IP-based digital ecosystem that delivers both access and value?</div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
<div style="backface-visibility: hidden; color: #212121; font-family: "PT Serif Regular", serif; font-size: 18px; line-height: 28px; list-style-type: none; outline: none; overflow-wrap: break-word; padding: 8px 20px; text-size-adjust: auto;">
Value creation will require a fresh policy mindset in 2019. A point of departure could be to better understand how countries such as the US have retained their economic strength in times of global flux. Part of the answer lies in the correlation between trade and intellectual property (IP). The US accounts for around one-third share of global IP exports—far outpacing China, which does not even figure in the top ten IP exporters despite frenetic patenting activity. While China has understood the need for more IP, its markets remain state-controlled.<span class="Apple-converted-space"> </span></div>
<div style="backface-visibility: hidden; color: #212121; font-family: "PT Serif Regular", serif; font-size: 18px; line-height: 28px; list-style-type: none; outline: none; overflow-wrap: break-word; padding: 8px 20px; text-size-adjust: auto;">
Nevertheless, it is axiomatic that innovation-centricity impacts the realization of economic value. In 2018, researchers found that while less than 10% of US manufacturing firms made IP filings, those that did accounted for 90% of its total merchandise exports. The nexus between innovation and competitiveness is universal. A balanced vision for domestic digital markets must therefore reflect the centrality of incentivizing and protecting innovation. And to be clear, this will require active state support in the entire spectrum of innovation, from engendering a culture of research to stronger enforcement of IP.</div>
</div>
<div>
<span style="background-color: white; caret-color: rgb(33, 33, 33); color: #212121; font-family: "PT Serif Regular", serif; font-size: 18px; text-size-adjust: auto;">Vivan Sharan is a technology policy expert and partner at Koan Advisory Group, New Delhi.</span></div>
</div>
vivan sharanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14813392915753123620noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1739355480870226467.post-79184070415390598232019-03-28T14:02:00.000+05:302019-03-28T14:02:40.600+05:30Koan Advisory's response to TRAI's public consultation on regulatory framework for OTT communications services, January 2019<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
The submission can be viewed at the following URL on TRAI's website:<div>
<a href="https://main.trai.gov.in/sites/default/files/KoanAdvisoryGroup09012019.pdf?fbclid=IwAR3RgxsKBJuJM01IPkx9KctEEZd09se3NrXBPsA0NSoY3J2pgaoYsM4UT6A">https://main.trai.gov.in/sites/default/files/KoanAdvisoryGroup09012019.pdf?fbclid=IwAR3RgxsKBJuJM01IPkx9KctEEZd09se3NrXBPsA0NSoY3J2pgaoYsM4UT6A</a></div>
</div>
vivan sharanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14813392915753123620noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1739355480870226467.post-6356984418789841012019-03-28T14:00:00.001+05:302019-03-28T14:00:28.259+05:30Koan Advisory's response to public consultation by Competition Law Review Committee, December 2018<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
The submission can be viewed at this link:<br />
<a href="https://drive.google.com/file/d/1rj3ULtJwJ9-1Rqsktw-QXngU1KmHK_8T/view?usp=sharing">https://drive.google.com/file/d/1rj3ULtJwJ9-1Rqsktw-QXngU1KmHK_8T/view?usp=sharing</a></div>
vivan sharanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14813392915753123620noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1739355480870226467.post-45847581281985770912019-03-28T13:58:00.002+05:302019-03-28T13:58:48.112+05:30Koan Advisory's counter-comments to Public Consultation on Draft National Policy on Electronics, November 2018<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
The file can be accessed at the following google drive link:<br />
<a href="https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B1s7nPA4S-GTbF8tSWh0X1poY2pqTTI1TWVYQkVpaG50Ykdz/view?usp=sharing"> https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B1s7nPA4S-GTbF8tSWh0X1poY2pqTTI1TWVYQkVpaG50Ykdz/view?usp=sharing</a></div>
vivan sharanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14813392915753123620noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1739355480870226467.post-56858460024284849452019-03-28T12:31:00.001+05:302019-03-28T12:31:35.827+05:30TRAI OTT Consultation Paper: Need To Level Regulatory Playing Field, Give More Teeth To CCI, Firstpost, Vivan Sharan and Mohit Kalawatia, 06 December 2018<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
Original Link<br />
<a href="https://www.firstpost.com/tech/news-analysis/trai-ott-consultation-paper-need-to-level-regulatory-playing-field-give-more-teeth-to-cci-5678141.html?fbclid=IwAR2EX0ZyTKd3Owom5sorl8i2KDgTTFJH7LU5FW_QeVG4Ia6p4VysAV8rpyE">https://www.firstpost.com/tech/news-analysis/trai-ott-consultation-paper-need-to-level-regulatory-playing-field-give-more-teeth-to-cci-5678141.html?fbclid=IwAR2EX0ZyTKd3Owom5sorl8i2KDgTTFJH7LU5FW_QeVG4Ia6p4VysAV8rpyE</a><br />
<br />
<div style="box-sizing: border-box; font-family: "Titillium Web", sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin-bottom: 15px; text-size-adjust: auto;">
Online service providers operate in a largely uncharted regulatory space in contrast to their cousins and progenitors in the offline world. For instance, telecom service providers (TSPs) and broadcasting linked distribution platform operators (DPOs) are licenced by the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (TRAI), whereas applications used to communicate or distribute voice, text or video content over the internet are not. This lack of licencing or regulatory parity has led to repeated calls by traditional incumbents for levelling the regulatory playing field – particularly as their own profits have shrunk with the expansion of competing for online services.</div>
<div style="box-sizing: border-box; font-family: "Titillium Web", sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin-bottom: 15px; text-size-adjust: auto;">
The influence of the internet on society has also grown inexorably – best exemplified by the<span class="Apple-converted-space"> </span><a href="https://www.firstpost.com/tech/news-analysis/facebook-twitter-to-face-us-congress-over-efforts-to-combat-foreign-influences-5117031.html" style="box-sizing: border-box; color: #007bff; text-decoration-line: none;"><strong style="box-sizing: border-box;">US Senate hearings on social media platforms</strong></a><span class="Apple-converted-space"> </span>following allegations of Russian interference in the 2016 elections. This, in turn, has raised legitimate questions about whether there are enough regulatory safeguards to protect users (and democracies) from vulnerabilities linked to now ubiquitous online services. Such services are also known as Over the Top (OTT) services owing to the fact that they are delivered over the public internet.</div>
<div style="box-sizing: border-box; font-family: "Titillium Web", sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin-bottom: 15px; text-size-adjust: auto;">
OTT services would technically fall under the jurisdiction of a regulator under the Information Technology (IT) Ministry. However, much to its chagrin, the IT Ministry has no dedicated regulator of its own. Naturally, the importance that regulators enjoy within governments the world over is directly proportionate to the size of their jurisdictions. Therefore, calls for parity from regulated entities has provided an enthusiastic TRAI with ready rationale to try expanding its remit to include OTT services.</div>
<div style="box-sizing: border-box; font-family: "Titillium Web", sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin-bottom: 15px; text-size-adjust: auto;">
TRAI has recently<span class="Apple-converted-space"> </span><a href="https://www.trai.gov.in/consultation-paper-regulatory-framework-over-top-ott-communication-services" rel="nofollow" style="box-sizing: border-box; color: #007bff; text-decoration-line: none;" target="_blank"><strong style="box-sizing: border-box;">begun a process of public consultation</strong></a>, ostensibly on designing a regulatory framework for a subset of OTT services, that provide functionality akin to TSPs. These include OTT communication services like voice and text messaging. The origins of this process and its scope can be traced back a few years.</div>
<div style="box-sizing: border-box; font-family: "Titillium Web", sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin-bottom: 15px; text-size-adjust: auto;">
In 2015, TRAI had initially attempted to paint the entire OTT ecosystem with a broad brush, but the Department of Telecommunications (DoT) which has always had mixed feelings about an independent TRAI, quickly redrew the perimeter for future consultations. It essentially prioritised regulation of OTT communication services over other services such as e-retail, content and media.</div>
<div style="box-sizing: border-box; font-family: "Titillium Web", sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin-bottom: 15px; text-size-adjust: auto;">
At the heart of the latest TRAI consultation is whether the construct of ‘substitutability’ between TSPs and OTT communication services should be applied for comparing regulatory burdens applicable to both markets. That is if services like WhatsApp allow similar functionality to text messaging, should they not be equally regulated? Such logic can be extended indefinitely and prompt legacy approaches to regulations that may not be appropriate for digital markets.</div>
<div style="box-sizing: border-box; font-family: "Titillium Web", sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin-bottom: 15px; text-size-adjust: auto;">
For instance, online taxi aggregators can potentially be called substitutes to black and yellow taxis, online video providers to broadcasters, online retailers to offline counterparts and so on.</div>
<div style="box-sizing: border-box; font-family: "Titillium Web", sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin-bottom: 15px; text-size-adjust: auto;">
Therefore, there is merit in looking at metrics other than substitutability alone to ensure clarity of regulatory scope and compliance.</div>
<div style="box-sizing: border-box; font-family: "Titillium Web", sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin-bottom: 15px; text-size-adjust: auto;">
The fact is that the market impact of large OTT services should be a matter of concern for antitrust regulators globally – and this is directly related to whether OTT services and TSPs operate in the same markets. The subsequent moot question is whether they act as a substitute for each other within these markets.</div>
<div style="box-sizing: border-box; font-family: "Titillium Web", sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin-bottom: 15px; text-size-adjust: auto;">
To be clear, sectoral regulators like TRAI have a legitimate interest in such antitrust matters, that impact the jurisdictions they regulate. However, using substitutability as the sole determinant of future regulation deviates from the approach adopted by the nodal antitrust regulator, the Competition Commission of India (CCI).</div>
<div style="box-sizing: border-box; font-family: "Titillium Web", sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin-bottom: 15px; text-size-adjust: auto;">
Even-though the CCI is new to the digital economy and has limited technical expertise, its evolving determinations of relevant markets should inform the TRAI process. For instance, in a<span class="Apple-converted-space"> </span><a href="https://www.firstpost.com/business/corporate-business/cci-gets-complaint-against-flipkart-other-e-retailers-1995607.html" style="box-sizing: border-box; color: #007bff; text-decoration-line: none;"><strong style="box-sizing: border-box;">complaint against Snapdeal in 2014</strong></a>, it was alleged that the e-retail platform had abused its dominant market position by entering into an exclusive agreement with sellers using its platform. The CCI subsequently held that online and offline markets are merely two different channels of product distribution and do not constitute distinct markets. This was akin to the functional approach that TRAI is now exploring.</div>
<div style="box-sizing: border-box; font-family: "Titillium Web", sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin-bottom: 15px; text-size-adjust: auto;">
However, the order passed by the CCI in a complaint against WhatsApp highlights a sharp learning curve. In 2016, a complainant alleged that WhatsApp held a dominant position in the relevant market for ‘free messaging apps available for various smartphones globally’. The CCI held that such communication services cannot be compared with “the traditional electronic communication services such as text messaging, voice calls etc.” made available by TSPs. This is because they differ in characteristics such as accessibility (wherein the former can only be used via a smartphone), pricing models and additional functions available to users. Subsequently, even in<span class="Apple-converted-space"> </span><a href="https://www.firstpost.com/business/cci-rejects-predatory-pricing-allegations-against-ola-2988704.html" style="box-sizing: border-box; color: #007bff; text-decoration-line: none;"><strong style="box-sizing: border-box;">cases against Ola (2016)</strong></a> and<span class="Apple-converted-space"> </span><a href="https://www.firstpost.com/tech/news-analysis/cci-clears-google-of-charges-of-employing-unfair-business-practices-in-india-4731531.html" style="box-sizing: border-box; color: #007bff; text-decoration-line: none;"><strong style="box-sizing: border-box;">Google (2018)</strong></a>, the CCI held that online markets differ from their offline counterparts, due to the presence of specific characteristics.</div>
<div style="box-sizing: border-box; font-family: "Titillium Web", sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin-bottom: 15px; text-size-adjust: auto;">
Evidently, the identification of market characteristics is a nuanced exercise with constant scope for technical improvements – something that the TRAI must acknowledge in its assessments, however preliminary.</div>
<div style="box-sizing: border-box; font-family: "Titillium Web", sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin-bottom: 15px; text-size-adjust: auto;">
More recently, the CCI also employed available policy definitions to determine relevant markets in a case against Flipkart. Since the IT Act provides legal recognition to all electronic communications and commerce of which OTT services are a subset, the IT Ministry should take on the task of defining various OTT services through a modern IT policy. This should ideally precede any regulatory pronouncements by the TRAI, since it is a settled principle of law that the delegated power available to regulators is limited to what is imagined under their parent legislation. Importantly, a legislature cannot delegate ‘essential legislative functions’ to a body such as TRAI.</div>
<div style="box-sizing: border-box; font-family: "Titillium Web", sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin-bottom: 15px; text-size-adjust: auto;">
Additionally, global best-practices can provide templates to engender greater institutional coherence between regulators like TRAI and CCI. For instance, the<span class="Apple-converted-space"> </span><a href="http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2013/24/contents/enacted" rel="nofollow" style="box-sizing: border-box; color: #007bff; text-decoration-line: none;" target="_blank"><strong style="box-sizing: border-box;">UK’s Enterprise and Reform Act, 2013</strong></a><span class="Apple-converted-space"> </span>has enhanced the role of the Competition and Market Authority (CMA – UK’s competition regulator) and mandated consultations with relevant sectoral regulators to settle jurisdictional questions. Further, it mandates the exchange of information about possible antitrust issues across markets.</div>
<div style="box-sizing: border-box; font-family: "Titillium Web", sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin-bottom: 15px; text-size-adjust: auto;">
Similarly, South Africa’s Competition Commission has entered into several MoUs with sectoral regulators. Such agreements are guided by the provisions of South Africa’s competition law under which the competition regulator is responsible for negotiating agreements with sectoral regulators with which it shares jurisdiction.</div>
<div style="box-sizing: border-box; font-family: "Titillium Web", sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin-bottom: 15px; text-size-adjust: auto;">
In 2011, a high-level committee constituted by the Ministry of Corporate Affairs (MCA) had also recommended that India’s Competition Act be amended to provide for mandatory consultation between CCI and sectoral regulators like the TRAI. Despite this, and the increasing role of antitrust in digital markets, the CCI is an emaciated body today – without a specialised appellate tribunal and lacking full strength of its Board Members. Since yet another MCA Committee has been formed to review competition law this year, perhaps it can revisit such pending recommendations and consequently attempt to level the playing field between regulators.</div>
<div style="box-sizing: border-box; font-family: "Titillium Web", sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin-bottom: 15px; text-size-adjust: auto;">
<em style="box-sizing: border-box;">The authors are technology policy experts at Koan Advisory Group, New Delhi.</em></div>
<div>
<em style="box-sizing: border-box;"><br /></em></div>
</div>
vivan sharanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14813392915753123620noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1739355480870226467.post-58339136898571812402018-11-16T16:08:00.005+05:302018-11-16T16:11:43.554+05:30"Reinterpreting public interest broadcasting", Vivan Sharan, LiveMint, 09 November 2018<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<div class="S3l" style="font-family: Georgia, serif; font-size: 18px; margin-bottom: 20px; padding: 0px;" xmlns:fn="http://www.w3.org/2005/xpath-functions">
<a href="https://www.livemint.com/Opinion/OEwip7WXiefZawN0MmFJwK/Opinion--Reinterpreting-public-interest-broadcasting.html?fbclid=IwAR30QBPrGosOKv0Fbcoa3NtXuJjiy4cqy7sV4S9sEo6HutqcAo7ZJy2hIvw">Original Link</a></div>
<div class="S3l" style="font-family: Georgia, serif; font-size: 18px; margin-bottom: 20px; padding: 0px;" xmlns:fn="http://www.w3.org/2005/xpath-functions">
Populist politics tends to lead to short-term policy goals in most democracies. This is why many economic policies aim at instant consumer gratification in India—and explains why even minimal fuel price cuts regularly make headlines. Part of the job of a responsible bureaucracy is to espouse more balanced public interest objectives. This includes acknowledging the fact that the long-term welfare of market participants such as producers and intermediaries also affects consumers. However, line ministries like the ministry of information and broadcasting (MIB) often fail to perform this balancing act for the markets they govern. </div>
<div style="font-family: Georgia, serif; font-size: 18px; margin-bottom: 20px; padding: 0px;">
Unenviably, the MIB functions as a licensor in a broadcasting market where there are hundreds of private operators spanning print, television and radio. The need for economic liberalization three decades ago had already confirmed that licences are inimical to market growth. Today, licencing is reminiscent of a bygone era of acute market scarcities. Additionally, the internet has rapidly democratized consumer access to content markets globally, outside of any such licencing paradigm. Yet, the MIB shows a persistent bias towards licencing-inspired interventions to stay relevant. For example, its latest rulemaking initiative may permanently distort the market for sports broadcasting in India. </div>
<div style="font-family: Georgia, serif; font-size: 18px; margin-bottom: 20px; padding: 0px;">
Specifically, the MIB plans to introduce a legislative amendment to force content owners to share live sports signals deemed to be of “National Importance” with the public broadcaster, Prasar Bharati, for re-transmission over private TV distribution networks. It would do so through the relevant Doordarshan channels. A public consultation document has been floated by the MIB in mid-October to this effect. </div>
<div style="font-family: Georgia, serif; font-size: 18px; margin-bottom: 20px; padding: 0px;">
</div>
<div id="U301242495985G4H" style="font-family: Georgia, serif; font-size: 18px; margin-bottom: 20px; padding: 0px;">
TV broadcasts are carried to over 150 million homes by private cable and satellite distribution networks. Another 30 million homes access public-service broadcasts through direct to home and terrestrial networks owned by Prasar Bharati. The Sports Broadcasting Signals Act, 2007 (“the Act”) which the MIB wishes to amend, was promulgated to make sports-broadcasts of “national importance” available to low-income homes. Simultaneously, all distributors are mandated to carry Doordarshan channels by an older law governing private networks. Until recently, Prasar Bharati chose to employ a combined interpretation of both laws to retransmit sports broadcasts acquired under the Act through public and private networks. </div>
<div style="font-family: Georgia, serif; font-size: 18px; margin-bottom: 20px; padding: 0px;">
However, in August 2017, the Supreme Court clarified the obligation of content owners as being limited to sharing of sports signals for re-transmission only over Prasar Bharati’s networks. The MIB now seeks to bypass this judicial interpretation, in order “to ensure access to the largest number of viewers”. This motive is suspect because free sports programming of national interest is already made available on the airwaves under the Act. Any lack of consumption of free programming is simply a function of consumer choice in favour of private networks. It is safe to assume that households which can pay for private networks can easily put an additional dish or antenna to access free sports programming. </div>
<div style="font-family: Georgia, serif; font-size: 18px; margin-bottom: 20px; padding: 0px;">
Conversely, if a live signal is carried simultaneously on both paid and free TV, advertisers would naturally pay less for their time slots on private networks, eroding the margins of businesses which own the underlying content. And Prasar Bharati would see a windfall without taking any production risk because live sporting events would draw greater advertising revenues than its usual repertoire of content.</div>
<div style="font-family: Georgia, serif; font-size: 18px; margin-bottom: 20px; padding: 0px;">
</div>
<div style="font-family: Georgia, serif; font-size: 18px; margin-bottom: 20px; padding: 0px;">
Reducing the scope for monetising privately-held intellectual property (IP) is akin to throttling the lifeline of the sports economy in India—a fact not unknown to the MIB. Prasar Bharati had negotiated acquisition of five-year rights to broadcast Indian cricket matches for a paltry sum of ₹227 crore in 1999 with the BCCI, whereas a similar set of rights were subsequently sold for about 12 times this value to a private broadcaster in 2006. A panic-struck MIB pre-empted its inability to compete in an open market, and issued an ordinance which served as a precursor to the 2007 Act. </div>
<div id="U30124249598519B" style="font-family: Georgia, serif; font-size: 18px; margin-bottom: 20px; padding: 0px;">
IP rights for broadcasting account for well over 85% of hockey and football revenues too. The growth of regional sporting leagues which has finally made sports a viable career is fuelled by similar economics. Owing to limited scope for scaling up government expenditure, most future investments in local sports be private sector driven. The global sports market is already worth around 1% of gross domestic product (GDP), whereas the annual ‘Khelo India’ cash outlay works out to less than 0.04% of India’s GDP.</div>
<div style="font-family: Georgia, serif; font-size: 18px; margin-bottom: 20px; padding: 0px;">
Unfortunately, the creation of market value spurs predatory impulses within corresponding line ministries. Consequently, the MIB is interpreting public interest narrowly and in self-interest—by forcibly acquiring private IP for profit. Prasar Bharati barely generates enough revenue to cover its own programming costs—and is dependent on heavy grants from the MIB. Re-transmitting the IP owned by others will perpetuate this culture of handouts rather than stimulate any impetus towards creating quality public-service content. Prasar Bharati may soon become completely unable to overcome its structural deficits, like many other publicly-owned body corporates. This would leave Indian consumers worse-off in the long run, even as the proposed legislative amendment nips the growth of the nascent sports economy in the bud. </div>
<div style="font-family: Georgia, serif; font-size: 18px; margin-bottom: 20px; padding: 0px;">
</div>
<div style="font-family: Georgia, serif; font-size: 18px; margin-bottom: 20px; padding: 0px;">
<i style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">Vivan Sharan is a Partner at Koan Advisory Group, New Delhi. These are is personal views.</i></div>
</div>
vivan sharanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14813392915753123620noreply@blogger.com0